t24.com.tr
1027th Week of Protests: Unresolved Disappearance of Ahmet Yetişen
The Cumartesi Anneleri, in their 1027th week of protests, demanded answers regarding the enforced disappearance of Ahmet Yetişen, who was detained with his 13-year-old son in Batman on November 13, 1994; despite numerous appeals, investigations into his disappearance remain unresolved.
- What steps have the Yetişen family taken to seek justice, and what obstacles have they faced?
- The case highlights the ongoing struggle for justice and accountability regarding enforced disappearances in Turkey. The lack of resolution after all these years demonstrates a pattern of impunity for human rights abuses. The family's persistent efforts underscore the profound impact of enforced disappearances on families and society.
- What are the broader implications of this case for human rights in Turkey, and how can the cycle of impunity be broken?
- The unresolved case of Ahmet Yetişen symbolizes the broader issue of transitional justice in Turkey. The continued protests by Cumartesi Anneleri reveal the deep-seated societal trauma caused by state-sponsored violence and the failure of the judicial system to deliver accountability. This persistent lack of resolution creates a chilling effect, undermining efforts to prevent similar human rights violations.
- What are the key facts surrounding the disappearance of Ahmet Yetişen, and what is the significance of the Cumartesi Anneleri's continued protests?
- Cumartesi Anneleri held their 1027th week of protests demanding answers about the enforced disappearance of Ahmet Yetişen, who was taken into custody on November 13, 1994, and never seen again. His son, Hanifi, was also detained and tortured. Despite numerous appeals to authorities, the case remains unsolved.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is sympathetic to the victims, emphasizing the suffering caused by the disappearance and the lack of justice. The headline and the repeated mention of the 1027th week of protests highlight the longevity and persistence of the mothers' struggle. This might evoke empathy and support for their cause.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, though terms like "gözaltında kaybetme" (disappearance in custody) could be considered emotionally charged. However, it accurately reflects the nature of the event and avoids excessive sensationalism.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the case of Ahmet Yetişen, but it omits broader context regarding the number of similar cases and the overall human rights situation in Turkey during that period. This omission might limit the reader's understanding of the systematic nature of such disappearances.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a case of enforced disappearance and alleged torture, demonstrating a failure of the justice system to protect human rights and hold perpetrators accountable. This directly undermines SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.