english.elpais.com
12.5 Million Workers Serve the Super-Rich: A Booming Industry
A Morgan Stanley study reveals over 12.5 million people globally work for the super-rich, with salaries ranging from $67,000 for gardeners to $151,000 for estate managers, a number fueled by the 626,000 individuals with a net worth exceeding $30 million.
- How does the growing number of ultra-high-net-worth individuals impact the demand for specialized services and the overall economy?
- The increasing wealth concentration fuels the demand for specialized services. The ultra-wealthy require discreet, highly skilled staff to manage their complex lifestyles, leading to a burgeoning industry with high salaries and specialized roles like art management and lifestyle consulting. This creates a significant economic impact, boosting demand in various sectors.
- What is the size and scope of the global workforce employed by the super-rich, and what are the average salaries across different roles?
- The super-rich employ a vast network of highly specialized professionals, exceeding 12.5 million globally, based on a Morgan Stanley study. These employees manage diverse tasks, from estate management to personal shopping and security, with average salaries ranging from $67,000 for gardeners to $151,000 for estate managers. This workforce is growing rapidly alongside the increasing number of ultra-high-net-worth individuals.
- What are the likely future trends in the industry catering to the super-rich, and how will these trends affect employment and required skills?
- The evolution of this industry reflects changing needs and expectations of the ultra-wealthy. Future trends may include increasing demand for bespoke services, technological integration in household management, and a greater emphasis on wellness and lifestyle management, impacting job roles and skill requirements.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the narrative positively towards the employees of the super-rich, highlighting their specialized skills, high salaries, and access to a unique world. While acknowledging the demanding nature of the work, the focus remains on the benefits and opportunities.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive. While terms like "super-rich" could be considered loaded, they are used descriptively rather than judgmentally. The article avoids overly sensational or emotional language.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the professional lives of those who work for the super-rich, and doesn't explore the perspectives of the super-rich themselves or the potential downsides of their lifestyles. There is no mention of criticism or negative perspectives regarding the employment of large numbers of staff by the wealthy.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it does present a somewhat idealized view of the employment landscape for those working for the wealthy, focusing on the positive aspects of high salaries and unique experiences without fully addressing potential drawbacks or negative experiences.
Gender Bias
The article features a mix of male and female professionals, but doesn't explicitly analyze gender disparities in pay or roles. More detailed analysis is needed to assess potential gender bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the significant job creation within the sector catering to the ultra-wealthy. It details various high-paying roles with average salaries provided, showcasing economic opportunities and specialized employment within this niche market. The growth in the super-rich population further fuels this job market expansion.