14 Complutense University Professors Accused of Harassment

14 Complutense University Professors Accused of Harassment

elmundo.es

14 Complutense University Professors Accused of Harassment

Fourteen Complutense University of Madrid professors face sexual or sexist harassment accusations in the last three years, along with nine students and four administrative staff, prompting an investigation into co-founder of Podemos, Juan Carlos Monedero, and highlighting the university's Equality Unit's role in processing complaints.

Spanish
Spain
JusticeSpainGender IssuesSexual HarassmentAcademiaJuan Carlos MonederoUniversidad Complutense
Universidad Complutense De MadridPodemos
Juan Carlos Monedero
How does the Complutense University's Equality Unit function, and what are its limitations in addressing harassment complaints?
The Complutense University's Equality Unit, established in 2022, processed 27 harassment cases—14 against professors, nine against students, and four against administrative staff. While the university doesn't specify outcomes, it clarifies that these cases didn't involve sexual assault or gender-based violence, which fall outside the unit's protocol. The unit's role is limited to processing, advising, and resource provision, not issuing sanctions.
What is the scale and nature of harassment complaints against Complutense University professors, and what is the university's response?
In the past three years, 14 Complutense University of Madrid professors faced accusations of sexual or sexist harassment from students or colleagues. Juan Carlos Monedero, a Podemos co-founder and professor, is under investigation for alleged sexual harassment following multiple complaints, including one from a student. The university's Equality Unit handled 27 such cases since 2022.
What broader systemic issues within the university might contribute to the high number of harassment allegations, and what proactive steps could be implemented to prevent future incidents?
The high number of harassment cases at Complutense University highlights the need for robust preventative measures and improved support systems for victims. The university's focus on processing complaints, while crucial, must be complemented by proactive strategies to prevent harassment and ensure a safe learning and working environment. The lack of specific information on case outcomes limits a full assessment of the university's response.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article's framing emphasizes the number of cases and the fact that Juan Carlos Monedero, a high-profile figure, is implicated. This framing may lead readers to focus on the negative aspects of the university, rather than providing a balanced perspective on the institution's efforts to address these issues. The headline, if there was one, would significantly affect the reader's perception.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and factual. However, the repeated use of the word "presuntos" (alleged) before the accusations could be considered slightly loaded, suggesting a degree of doubt about the validity of the claims.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article omits information on the outcomes of the investigations, the number of disciplinary actions taken, and whether any cases were archived or referred to the prosecutor's office. This lack of detail prevents a complete understanding of the university's response to the allegations. Additionally, while the article mentions support for victims of gender-based violence outside the protocol, specifics about the types and extent of that support are absent. This omission limits the reader's ability to assess the university's comprehensive approach to addressing these issues.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by distinguishing between "cases of aggression sexual or other gender violence" which are not covered by the protocol, and other forms of harassment. This implies a hierarchy of seriousness, potentially downplaying the significance of the cases covered under the protocol. The complexities of different forms of harassment are not fully explored.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article focuses on the gender of both accusers and accused, which, while relevant, risks reinforcing gender stereotypes. There is a consistent specification of genders, potentially highlighting the imbalance of power dynamics often associated with gender-based harassment. However, this alone does not constitute a strong gender bias.

Sustainable Development Goals

Gender Equality Positive
Direct Relevance

The article reports on the Complutense University of Madrid's handling of numerous sexual harassment and sexism complaints, indicating a proactive approach to addressing gender inequality within the institution. The university's establishment of a dedicated Equality Unit and its investigation of complaints, including those against high-profile individuals, demonstrates a commitment to creating a safer environment for students and staff. While the article notes that some cases may not be classified as gender-based violence under their protocol, the university does provide support to victims of such violence. This initiative contributes positively towards SDG 5 (Gender Equality) by promoting gender-sensitive policies and creating mechanisms for addressing gender-based harassment.