2024 Global Temperature Exceeds 1.5 Degrees Celsius, but Official Declaration Delayed

2024 Global Temperature Exceeds 1.5 Degrees Celsius, but Official Declaration Delayed

zeit.de

2024 Global Temperature Exceeds 1.5 Degrees Celsius, but Official Declaration Delayed

The global average temperature in 2024 surpassed the pre-industrial level by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius for the first time on record, according to the EU's Copernicus Climate Change Service, although the official declaration of exceeding the Paris Agreement's 1.5-degree target is delayed due to the use of a 20-year rolling average.

German
Germany
Climate ChangeScienceExtreme WeatherGlobal WarmingParis AgreementClimate Science1.5 Degree Target
Copernicus Climate Change ServicePotsdam Institute For Climate Impact Research (Pik)Met OfficeUniversity Of ExeterGlobal Carbon ProjectAlfred Wegener InstituteGerman Weather Service (Dwd)World Meteorological Organization
Nico WunderlingRichard BettsMojib LatifHelge GößlingTobias Fuchs
What are the immediate implications of 2024 exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius warming threshold, considering the official definition uses a 20-year average?
The global average temperature in 2024 exceeded the pre-industrial level by more than 1.5 degrees Celsius for the first time on record, according to Copernicus. However, the Paris Agreement's 1.5-degree target is based on a 20-year average, meaning a formal declaration of exceeding this limit won't be possible for years.
What are the underlying causes of the discrepancy between the observed temperature and the official declaration of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius threshold?
While 2024's temperature surpasses the 1.5-degree threshold, the official assessment uses a 20-year rolling average. This methodology, used by the IPCC, delays confirmation of exceeding the limit until well after the event, creating a time lag between exceeding the threshold and official declaration.
What alternative methods could provide more timely assessments of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius threshold and what are the potential benefits and drawbacks of these methods?
The discrepancy between the observed temperature exceeding 1.5 degrees Celsius and the delayed official declaration highlights a critical issue: the inherent lag in the climate system. Even if greenhouse gas emissions were to cease immediately, the warming trend would continue for decades due to the system's inertia. This underscores the urgency of immediate and drastic action.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the discussion around the 20-year average temperature, giving significant weight to the official definition and the resulting delay in declaring the 1.5-degree limit exceeded. This emphasizes the official position and potentially downplays the urgency conveyed by shorter-term temperature increases. The headline could be framed to better reflect the urgency of the situation.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral and objective, using direct quotes from experts to support claims. However, phrases such as "beautiful backdoor" (referring to political strategies) and "climate catastrophe" could be considered emotionally charged. More neutral alternatives might be 'convenient political strategy' and 'severe weather events' respectively.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses on the surpassing of the 1.5-degree warming limit as defined by a 20-year average, but omits discussion of alternative metrics or shorter-term analyses that might paint a different picture. While it mentions the World Meteorological Organization exploring alternative approaches, it doesn't detail these alternatives or their potential implications. This omission could limit the reader's understanding of the ongoing scientific debate surrounding the appropriate measurement of global warming.

4/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the exceeding of the 1.5-degree limit as a binary: either it is definitively exceeded or it is not. It overlooks the nuanced interpretations and the ongoing scientific discussion around the best method for measuring global warming. The focus on a 20-year average creates a simplified, eitheor scenario that neglects the complexity of climate change and its various measurement approaches.

Sustainable Development Goals

Climate Action Negative
Direct Relevance

The article reports that 2024 is likely the warmest year since the start of industrialization, with global temperatures exceeding 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. This directly contradicts the Paris Agreement's goal to limit warming to well below 2 degrees, preferably to 1.5 degrees. The article highlights that even if greenhouse gas emissions were to stop, the warming trend would continue for decades. Increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, such as the record rainfall in Spain and Central Europe, are attributed to climate change. The rising CO2 emissions further worsen the situation, indicating a lack of progress towards climate action goals.