nrc.nl
2024: Global Temperatures Exceed 1.5°C Paris Agreement Limit
2024 was the warmest year globally since 1850, exceeding the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C limit by 1.6°C, due to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions and amplified by natural phenomena such as El Niño.
- What are the immediate consequences of 2024 exceeding the 1.5°C warming limit set by the Paris Agreement?
- In 2024, the global average temperature exceeded the 1.5°C limit set by the Paris Agreement for the first time, reaching 1.6°C above the 1850 baseline, according to multiple sources including Copernicus, WMO, NOAA, and NASA. This signifies a critical milestone in climate change, exceeding the internationally agreed-upon threshold for limiting global warming.
- How much did natural phenomena like El Niño and volcanic eruptions contribute to the record-breaking temperatures in 2024?
- The record-breaking temperature of 2024 is attributed to human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and increased concentrations of greenhouse gases. While natural phenomena like El Niño contributed to the peak, the underlying trend is driven by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, exceeding even the impact of the Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption by 0.23°C, according to Copernicus.
- What are the potential long-term consequences if the current trend of increasing greenhouse gas emissions and accelerating warming continues?
- The 2024 temperature record underscores the accelerating pace of global warming, with a rate of increase of approximately 0.26°C per decade. This trajectory suggests we may reach the 2°C warming threshold within the next two decades, unless significant emission reductions occur. Furthermore, potential positive feedback loops, such as increased methane emissions from wetlands, could further accelerate warming.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the severity of the temperature increase and the potential for exceeding the 2°C target. While presenting multiple perspectives on the Paris Agreement's success, the overall tone leans toward highlighting the challenges and risks associated with climate change. The article's structure, with its focus on increasingly alarming scenarios (1.5°C threshold exceeded, potential for 2°C, consequences for humanity and nature), contributes to this framing. The use of questions in the article's structure might be seen as a neutral approach but does allow for the reader to be guided toward a perspective of urgency.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, avoiding overtly loaded terms. While the descriptions of climate change impacts are naturally concerning, they are presented factually rather than emotionally charged. The use of phrases like "hard on weg naar 2 graden opwarming" (translated as "hard on the way to 2 degrees warming") could be considered slightly alarmist, but the overall tone remains informative.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the global temperature increase and its implications, but it omits discussion of specific regional variations in temperature change and their associated impacts. While acknowledging the vulnerability of poorer nations, it lacks detailed examples or case studies illustrating the disproportionate effects on specific vulnerable populations or regions. This omission limits a comprehensive understanding of the uneven distribution of climate change consequences.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by framing the success or failure of the Paris Agreement solely on whether the 1.5°C threshold is exceeded. It correctly points out that the agreement considers long-term averages, but the implication that exceeding the threshold temporarily doesn't constitute failure simplifies the complexities of climate action and the urgency of emissions reduction. The nuances of mitigating already-observed effects and adapting to unavoidable changes are underemphasized.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article reports that 2024 was the warmest year on record, exceeding the 1.5°C limit set in the Paris Agreement. This directly relates to SDG 13 (Climate Action) which aims to take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. The exceeding of the 1.5°C limit signifies a significant setback in achieving the SDG's targets. The article highlights the continued increase in greenhouse gas emissions as a primary driver of this warming trend, further emphasizing the negative impact on SDG 13.