telegraaf.nl
2025: Passive Investing to Underperform; Active, Selective Approach Favored
Geert Schaaij of Beursgenoten predicts that passive investing will underperform in 2025 due to limited post-October 2023 market growth, advising investors to actively seek undervalued companies in sectors like European telecom, US consumer goods, and growth-oriented Asian firms, while anticipating numerous mergers and acquisitions.
- What are the key challenges and opportunities for investors in 2025, according to Geert Schaaij?
- Geert Schaaij of Beursgenoten predicts 2025 will be a challenging year for passive investment strategies like index or ETF tracking, due to limited growth potential after a 40% global market increase since October 2023. He advocates for active, selective investing, focusing on undervalued companies with strong growth potential.
- What specific sectors and regions does Schaaij highlight as promising investment areas for 2025, and why?
- Schaaij's prediction is based on the belief that post-October 2023 market gains limit index-level growth, favoring active stock picking. He highlights the need for differentiation among asset managers, warning that those failing to do so could face significant client losses in 2025.
- What broader economic trends or shifts underlie Schaaij's predictions for 2025, and what are the potential risks investors should be aware of?
- Schaaij identifies undervalued companies in sectors like European telecom and real estate, US consumer goods, and growth-oriented, high-dividend Asian firms as potential opportunities. He anticipates numerous mergers and acquisitions, advising investors to anticipate and capitalize on these events. He stresses the importance of careful portfolio management to mitigate potential market corrections.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative strongly emphasizes the expert's bullish predictions for active and selective investing in 2025. The headline (if any) and introduction likely highlight this optimistic outlook. This positive framing might disproportionately influence readers toward this investment strategy without acknowledging potential risks or alternative viewpoints.
Language Bias
The language used is generally positive and encouraging towards active investing. Terms like "kansen voor het oprapen" (opportunities galore), "parels" (pearls - referring to undervalued companies), and "winsten" (profits) create a sense of excitement and potential gains. While not overtly biased, these expressions could influence readers to feel more optimistic about the suggested strategies than a neutral tone would allow. More neutral alternatives could be "opportunities", "promising companies", and "returns".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the expert's opinion and predictions, potentially omitting counterarguments or alternative perspectives on market trends. It doesn't explore potential downsides of active investing or the risks associated with specific sectors mentioned. The lack of diverse viewpoints could limit the reader's ability to form a balanced and informed opinion.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the choice as either passive (index or ETF following) or active investing. It ignores the possibility of diversified portfolios combining both strategies or other investment approaches. This simplification might mislead readers into believing only two extreme options exist.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article promotes active and selective investing, potentially leading to better returns for a wider range of investors, thus reducing the inequality gap between those with access to sophisticated investment strategies and those who rely on simpler methods like index funds. The emphasis on identifying undervalued companies and those with strong growth potential could also benefit smaller, less well-known companies, contributing to a more equitable distribution of wealth.