2025: Third Hottest Year Predicted Due to Climate Change

2025: Third Hottest Year Predicted Due to Climate Change

news.sky.com

2025: Third Hottest Year Predicted Due to Climate Change

The Met Office forecasts 2025 as the third hottest year on record, exceeding pre-industrial levels by at least 1.29°C due to continued greenhouse gas emissions, despite the El Niño effect's decline.

English
United Kingdom
Climate ChangeScienceGlobal WarmingParis AgreementEl NiñoMet Office
Met Office
Adam ScaifeRachel Kyte
What factors, beyond the weakening El Niño effect, contribute to the forecast high temperature for 2025?
The prediction for 2025's high temperature reflects the ongoing upward trend in global average temperatures due to climate change. Despite the El Niño effect waning, accumulated greenhouse gases continue warming the planet, surpassing the temporary El Niño influence.
What is the projected global average temperature for 2025, and how does it compare to previous years and pre-industrial levels?
2025 is projected to be the third hottest year on record, with a global average temperature at least 1.29°C, potentially 1.4°C, above pre-industrial levels. This follows 2024 and 2023 as the hottest years, driven by sustained greenhouse gas emissions.
What are the implications of 2025's projected temperature for the Paris Agreement goals and ongoing international climate negotiations?
While El Niño contributed to the record temperatures of 2023 and 2024, the 2025 projection underscores the accelerating impact of climate change. Ongoing research investigates other factors, such as volcanic activity and aerosol changes, to fully understand the recent temperature surge. However, increasing greenhouse gases remain the primary driver of global warming.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article's framing emphasizes the severity of the predicted temperature increase, highlighting its record-breaking potential and the scientific certainty behind the prediction. The use of phrases such as "scientists already have a handle on how hot 2025 will be" and "pretty confident next year will be hot" contributes to a sense of urgency and concern. While this framing is not inherently biased, it could be balanced with a more detailed discussion of uncertainties and potential variations in the prediction.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral and factual, relying on data and expert quotes. However, phrases such as "racing to understand" and "worrying, anomalous heat" carry some emotional weight, slightly deviating from purely objective reporting. The use of the phrase "pretty confident" while describing the scientists' certainty isn't strictly objective, but rather reflects the colloquial nature of speech. Overall, the language is mostly neutral but contains some minor instances of subjective wording.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses primarily on the predicted temperature increase for 2025 and its relation to climate change, but it omits discussion of potential mitigating actions or policy responses to address this issue. While it mentions the Paris Agreement and the ongoing COP summits, it lacks detailed analysis of current governmental efforts or their effectiveness in combating climate change. The article also doesn't explore potential impacts of the predicted temperature increase on various sectors or regions.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a clear dichotomy between the temporary warming effect of El Niño and the underlying trend of climate change, but it could benefit from exploring more nuanced factors. While it mentions other potential contributors like volcanic eruptions and changes in aerosols, it doesn't fully delve into the complex interplay of these factors and their relative contributions to the overall temperature increase. This simplification might oversimplify the issue for readers.

Sustainable Development Goals

Climate Action Negative
Direct Relevance

The article reports that 2025 is likely to be the third hottest year on record, continuing a trend of rising global temperatures driven by climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. This directly contradicts the goals of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming. The mention of the Paris Agreement being more fragile highlights the challenges in achieving climate action goals.