dw.com
21,000 Ukrainian Soldiers Return to Duty After Self-Inflicted Desertion Following Amnesty
Between January and March 2025, 21,000 Ukrainian soldiers returned to duty after self-inflicted desertion (SID), following an amnesty period; this highlights systemic issues within the Ukrainian military, such as prolonged deployments and inadequate post-injury care.
- What were the immediate consequences of the amnesty period for Ukrainian soldiers who deserted and later returned to duty?
- Between January and March 2025, 21,000 Ukrainian soldiers returned to duty after self-inflicted desertion (SID). This followed an amnesty period ending in March, during which those who left their posts but returned voluntarily were exempt from prosecution. The amnesty aimed to address the widespread issue of SID, which accounted for the majority of military crimes in 2024.",
- How did the legal and practical response to self-inflicted desertion evolve during the period covered by the article, and what were the factors behind these changes?
- The surge in SID cases in 2024 prompted a change in legislation. While penalties for SID remained unchanged, courts lost the ability to grant leniency, leading to an overwhelming number of cases for civilian investigators. A tacit agreement between commanders and investigators emerged, allowing soldiers who returned to avoid prosecution; this was later formalized into law.",
- What long-term systemic issues within the Ukrainian military are highlighted by the widespread desertion rates, and what solutions might address these issues beyond the amnesty and streamlined return process?
- The high rate of SID highlights underlying issues within the Ukrainian military. Factors such as prolonged deployments without rotation, unresolved family matters, and inadequate post-injury care contribute to soldiers' decisions to desert. Although the amnesty and streamlined return process addressed the immediate issue of reintegrating deserters, it did not resolve the systemic problems driving the high desertion rates.",
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue of СЗЧ predominantly through the experiences of soldiers who returned to service. This focus, while providing valuable human interest, potentially downplays the severity of the problem and the potential negative impact of desertion on military operations. The headline and introduction could be improved to avoid this framing bias by presenting the issue as a more complex issue with multiple facets.
Language Bias
While the article strives for neutrality, certain word choices might subtly influence reader perception. Phrases such as "they were treated like slaves" (in relation to soldiers in the reserve battalion) use strong, emotive language. More neutral phrasing, such as "the conditions were harsh," might convey similar information without such a strong bias. The term "gnobyty" (to persecute, harass) is used to describe the treatment of one soldier by his commander, which is loaded language. A neutral alternative might be to describe the actions of the commander as "unfair treatment," or "unjust orders.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the experiences of soldiers who left their units (Self-Willful Leaving - СЗЧ) and returned, but it lacks the perspective of those who did not return. There is no analysis of the reasons why some soldiers chose not to return to service, potentially creating a biased representation of the overall situation. The article also omits the viewpoints of commanders and other military officials regarding the issue of СЗЧ and its impact on military operations. While the article touches on the challenges of investigation and prosecution, a more detailed discussion of the resources allocated to these efforts is missing.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between soldiers who left due to justifiable reasons (family matters, command conflicts, etc.) and those who abandoned their posts without cause. This oversimplifies the complex circumstances and motivations behind СЗЧ. It fails to explore the spectrum of reasons, potentially making it appear as if there are only two clear-cut options.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the issue of self-inflicted desertion (SIZh) among Ukrainian soldiers, a significant challenge to military discipline and justice. The amnesty program and efforts to reintegrate soldiers who return demonstrate a commitment to restorative justice and maintaining military strength. The focus on reintegrating soldiers back into service rather than solely on punishment is a positive step toward strengthening institutions and promoting reconciliation.