dw.com
25% Rise in English Channel Migrant Crossings in 2024
Migrant crossings of the English Channel surged 25% in 2024 to 36,816, the deadliest year on record with 76 deaths, despite government efforts to tackle people traffickers and increase returns; this coincides with historically high legal migration.
- What is the immediate impact of the 25% rise in English Channel migrant crossings in 2024?
- In 2024, migrant crossings of the English Channel increased by 25% to 36,816, exceeding 2023 figures but remaining below the 2022 record. This surge resulted in at least 76 deaths, the highest yearly toll recorded. French authorities also reported over 5,800 rescues and 870 foiled attempts.
- What are the potential long-term political and societal consequences of the ongoing challenges related to Channel crossings?
- The UK government's response to the increased Channel crossings, including scrapping the Rwanda plan and focusing on disrupting trafficking networks, faces ongoing challenges. The political impact is evident in rising support for anti-immigration parties, highlighting the complex interplay between immigration policy and public opinion. Long-term effects of new border strategies remain uncertain.
- How do the increased migrant returns and record-high legal migration contribute to the overall immigration picture in the UK?
- The rise in Channel crossings is linked to increased arrivals from Vietnam, Iran, and Syria, with Afghanistan leading in the first nine months of 2024. This coincides with record-high net legal migration, estimated at 728,000 by June 2024. A 25% increase in migrant returns to 29,000 also occurred, the highest since 2017.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction emphasize the increase in Channel crossings and the government's response, creating a narrative that prioritizes the political pressure on the Labour government. The inclusion of the statistic on the deadliest year for crossings is also presented upfront, adding emotional weight and potentially shaping the reader's interpretation toward a negative view of the situation. The later mention of increased returns is less prominent.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although terms like "surge" and "deadliest year" carry a negative connotation. The description of the government's actions as "pledged" and "targeted" could be considered slightly positive. More neutral alternatives could be used such as "increase" instead of "surge" and "highest number of deaths recorded" instead of "deadliest year".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the increase in irregular migration and the government's response, but omits discussion of the push factors driving migration, such as conflict, persecution, or economic hardship in migrants' home countries. It also doesn't explore the perspectives of migrants themselves, their reasons for migrating, or the challenges they face. While acknowledging high legal migration, it lacks detail on its causes or consequences. The article also does not include information on the success rates of the returns.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by focusing primarily on the negative aspects of irregular migration (increased numbers, deaths, government pressure) while mentioning high legal migration only briefly, without exploring the potential benefits or challenges of either. This framing may inadvertently lead readers to focus solely on the negative implications of irregular migration.
Sustainable Development Goals
The increase in irregular migration and the associated deaths highlight challenges in maintaining peace and security, and the strain on institutions managing migration flows. The political pressure on the government and rise of anti-immigration parties also indicate potential instability. The article mentions government efforts to tackle the issue, but their effectiveness remains unclear.