dw.com
39 Holocaust Organizations Quit X Over Antisemitism
On December 12, 2023, 39 UK and German Holocaust-related organizations and individuals deactivated their X accounts in protest of the platform's promotion of misinformation and antisemitism, joining a growing exodus since Elon Musk's takeover.
- What prompted 39 Holocaust-related organizations and individuals to simultaneously leave X?
- On December 12, 2023, 18 Holocaust-related organizations and 21 individuals primarily in the UK and Germany collectively deactivated their X accounts. This action, part of the "Not One More Word" initiative, protests the platform's amplification of misinformation, abuse, and antisemitic content.
- How does the "Not One More Word" initiative connect to broader concerns about online misinformation and hate speech?
- The "Not One More Word" initiative, spearheaded by the Association of Jewish Refugees (AJR), highlights concerns about X's algorithm promoting harmful content. Participants cited Elon Musk's endorsement of the "great replacement" theory as a pivotal moment, illustrating the platform's tolerance of hate speech.
- What are the long-term implications of this boycott for Holocaust education and remembrance on social media platforms?
- This coordinated departure signals a potential shift in how organizations approach social media, prioritizing ethical considerations over reach. The impact on Holocaust education and remembrance remains uncertain, as alternative platforms may not offer equal visibility. The success of this initiative might encourage similar actions against online hate speech.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story around the AJR's initiative, highlighting their decision-making process and rationale. This emphasizes the negative aspects of X and the ethical dilemma faced by Holocaust-related organizations. While other perspectives are mentioned, the framing might lead readers to view X more negatively than a more balanced perspective would allow.
Language Bias
The article uses some loaded language, such as "flourished," "disappeared," and "promoting it, pushing it." While conveying the organizations' concerns, these terms are not entirely neutral and could be replaced with more objective phrasing such as "increased," "decreased," and "amplifying it." The article also uses the term "racist, antisemitic" to describe the great replacement theory. While factually accurate, the use of these terms carries strong emotional weight.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the perspective of the AJR and GHWK, and their reasons for leaving X. While it mentions other organizations and individuals leaving, it doesn't delve into their specific motivations or experiences, potentially omitting diverse viewpoints on the impact of Elon Musk's ownership of X. The article also lacks a comprehensive analysis of the extent of misinformation and abuse on X, relying instead on the organizations' assertions.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between remaining on X and leaving, neglecting the complexity of balancing the platform's reach with ethical concerns. Some organizations might find a middle ground, using X while mitigating risks. The article also presents a dichotomy between the AJR's actions and accusations of political motivations, ignoring the possibility of both sides having valid points.
Sustainable Development Goals
The initiative contributes to SDG 16 by combating the spread of misinformation and hate speech, which are obstacles to peaceful and inclusive societies. By leaving X, these organizations are taking a stand against online platforms that promote hate speech and intolerance, thus contributing to a safer and more just digital environment. The organizations' commitment to education and remembrance also directly supports SDG 16's target of promoting the rule of law and ensuring access to justice for all.