80% of Beauty Products Marketed to Black Women Contain Hazardous Ingredients

80% of Beauty Products Marketed to Black Women Contain Hazardous Ingredients

theguardian.com

80% of Beauty Products Marketed to Black Women Contain Hazardous Ingredients

A new analysis of over 4,000 beauty products marketed towards Black women found 80% contain at least one moderately hazardous ingredient, highlighting a continued public health concern despite some state-level progress and federal efforts.

English
United Kingdom
HealthGender IssuesHealth RisksBlack WomenBeauty ProductsHazardous ChemicalsCosmetics RegulationEnvironmental Working Group
Environmental Working Group (Ewg)Food And Drug Administration (Fda)Blk + Grn
Alexa FriedmanKristin EdwardsJoe BidenDonald Trump
What are the most significant health risks posed by the hazardous ingredients found in beauty products marketed toward Black women, and what immediate actions are needed to mitigate these risks?
A new analysis reveals that 80% of over 4,000 beauty products marketed to Black women contain at least one moderately hazardous ingredient, with most containing multiple. This follows a similar 2016 study, and researchers suspect these chemicals contribute to higher disease rates in this group. Little progress has been made since 2016, despite some federal efforts.
How have differing federal administrations under Trump and Biden impacted the regulation of hazardous substances in cosmetics, and what role do state-level initiatives play in addressing this issue?
The study highlights the continued presence of hazardous chemicals like formaldehyde and quats in products popular among Black women, linked to various health problems including cancer and reproductive harm. The inconsistent federal regulation, with rollbacks under the Trump administration, underscores the need for state-level action and industry reform. The increased use of undisclosed "fragrance" ingredients, some banned in the EU, further complicates the issue.
What are the long-term implications of the continued use of undisclosed or poorly regulated chemicals in the beauty industry, and what strategies can effectively empower consumers to make informed choices?
While some progress was made with an 8% decrease in the use of parabens between 2016 and 2025, and state-level bans are creating pressure for safer products nationwide, the persistent high percentage of hazardous ingredients in beauty products marketed to Black women necessitates stronger federal regulations and increased consumer awareness. The lack of transparency regarding "fragrance" ingredients remains a significant concern.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The headline and introduction immediately highlight the alarming statistic of 80% of products containing hazardous ingredients. This sets a negative tone and frames the issue as a significant health crisis affecting Black women. While factually accurate, this framing could disproportionately emphasize the negative aspects and potentially incite fear or alarm among readers. The repeated mention of harmful chemicals and their potential consequences further reinforces this negative framing.

3/5

Language Bias

The language used is strong and emotive, employing terms like "hazardous," "toxins," and "embalming fluid." While these terms accurately reflect the nature of the chemicals, the repeated use of such alarming language contributes to a negative and fear-inducing tone. More neutral alternatives could be used to present the facts without undue alarm. For example, instead of 'toxins', phrases like 'chemicals of concern' or 'ingredients linked to health risks' could be used.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The analysis focuses heavily on the negative aspects of beauty products marketed towards Black women and the potential health risks, but it could benefit from including information on initiatives by the beauty industry to improve product safety or successful examples of safer product development. It also omits discussion of the economic factors influencing product formulations and pricing, which could contribute to understanding why safer alternatives might not be more widely available. Additionally, while mentioning the positive decrease in some dangerous chemicals, the article doesn't quantify the overall impact of this decrease on the health risks.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the federal government's role (and the perceived failures of the Trump administration) and the responsibility of the beauty industry and state governments. The reality is likely more nuanced, involving various stakeholders and complexities in regulations and market forces.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article focuses on the disproportionate impact of harmful chemicals on Black women. This is not inherently biased, as it highlights a genuine health disparity. However, it could benefit from explicitly mentioning whether similar studies have been conducted on other demographic groups to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the issue and avoid inadvertently reinforcing stereotypes about Black women's vulnerability.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Negative
Direct Relevance

The study reveals that 80% of beauty products marketed toward Black women contain moderately hazardous ingredients, potentially contributing to higher rates of diseases like uterine and breast cancers. The use of formaldehyde, quats, isothiazolinones, and fragrance—containing numerous harmful chemicals—poses significant health risks. While some progress has been made in reducing certain dangerous chemicals, the overall situation remains concerning, with many hazardous substances still prevalent in beauty products.