taz.de
"A Sky Like A Wall": Non-Verbal Communication in Contemporary Art
The Berlinische Galerie hosted "A Sky Like A Wall," a performance by Dance On, Kaleidoskop, and Rabih Mroué exploring communication through movement, music, and invented languages, inspired by Mroué's "Notebook of the Unspecified Color" and contrasting with Rineke Dijkstra's photographic exhibition.
- How does "A Sky Like A Wall" utilize non-verbal communication to explore contemporary challenges to understanding?
- The Dance On Ensemble, Kaleidoskop, and Rabih Mroué presented "A Sky Like A Wall," a performance at the Berlinische Galerie exploring communication beyond words. Eight duos of dancers and musicians interacted through movement, sounds, and invented languages, creating a dynamic, evolving soundscape.
- What role does Rabih Mroué's "Notebook of the Unspecified Color" play in shaping the performance's structure and themes?
- The performance used Schubert's String Quartet No. 13 alongside percussive sounds and improvisation, reflecting the Babel theme of diverse communication attempts. Audience members moved freely, observing interactions and interpreting the evolving relationships between performers and sounds.
- In what ways does the performance suggest alternative models for communication and connection in a world increasingly fragmented by language barriers and technological mediation?
- The performance contrasts with Rineke Dijkstra's silent portraits in a concurrent exhibition, highlighting the power of non-verbal communication. This juxtaposition suggests that art forms, including dance, music, and photography, can transcend linguistic barriers and foster connection.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review frames the performance overwhelmingly positively, highlighting its beauty and innovative approach to communication. While this is understandable given the context of a review, the lack of critical evaluation could be seen as a form of bias. The focus is on the harmonious aspects of the production rather than any potential flaws or shortcomings.
Language Bias
The language used is largely descriptive and appreciative. While positive, it's generally neutral, avoiding overly emotional or subjective terms. There is a consistent use of inclusive language. The only potential exception is the use of phrases like "sanft" (gentle) and "harmonieren" (harmonize) which, while descriptive, could be interpreted as subtly positive framing, but this is not overtly biased.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the performance aspects and artistic choices, omitting any discussion of potential political or social commentary within Mroué's work or the performance itself. It also lacks information about the audience's reception or response to the performance. This omission limits the scope of the review and prevents a complete understanding of the performance's impact.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a somewhat simplistic view of communication, contrasting verbal communication with artistic expression as if they are mutually exclusive or entirely separate forms. The reality is far more nuanced, with art often functioning as a powerful form of communication itself, sometimes even more effective than words.