europe.chinadaily.com.cn
Acemoglu: US Protectionism Undermines Global Order, Threatening Prosperity
In a Financial Times op-ed, Nobel economist Daron Acemoglu blames America's protectionist policies and institutional failures for undermining its own economic strength and global standing, warning of a self-reinforcing cycle of instability.
- What are the immediate economic and geopolitical consequences of the US's protectionist policies and institutional dysfunction?
- Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu warns that the US's "America First" policies, including trade wars and withdrawal from international agreements, are undermining the global order it created, jeopardizing its own economic prosperity. This strategy, instead of promoting national strength, exacerbates existing fault lines within the US system.
- What structural reforms are necessary to address the self-reinforcing cycle of institutional dysfunction and restore faith in US institutions?
- The US faces a future where its economic prosperity is threatened by its own actions, with no easy solutions in sight. The deep-seated institutional problems, coupled with growing societal polarization and the influence of the ultra-wealthy, create a formidable obstacle to reform and recovery. The continued global instability resulting from these issues poses significant risks.
- How has the concentration of wealth and the influence of tech giants contributed to the current political polarization and instability in the US?
- Acemoglu links the current US challenges to institutional dysfunction stemming from partisan gridlock and the growing influence of the wealthy. This has eroded public trust, hindering self-correction mechanisms within the political system and creating a self-reinforcing cycle of instability. The resulting polarization prevents compromise and fuels support for radical change.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline, "The Real Threat to American Prosperity," immediately frames the subject negatively, positioning Acemoglu's analysis as the definitive truth. The introduction reinforces this negativity by highlighting risks and uncertainties, and the article primarily focuses on criticisms of the current administration's policies. This emphasis on negative aspects shapes the reader's initial perception.
Language Bias
While the article maintains a relatively formal and neutral tone, certain word choices subtly influence the reader's interpretation. Terms like "weaponizing tariffs" and "coveting other countries' territories" carry negative connotations and present the administration's actions in a critical light. Using less charged language, such as "implementing tariffs" and "seeking to protect national interests," would provide a more neutral perspective.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the opinions and analysis of Daron Acemoglu, and while it mentions the concerns of some Americans, it doesn't explicitly present counterarguments or alternative perspectives on the state of the US economy or the effectiveness of the "America First" policies. There is no mention of potential positive economic impacts of these policies, or viewpoints supporting the current administration's approach. This omission limits the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the "America First" approach and the maintenance of the existing world order. It implies that these are mutually exclusive options, ignoring the possibility of nuanced approaches that could balance national interests with international cooperation. The portrayal of the political climate as solely a partisan struggle between Democrats and Republicans also simplifies a complex reality.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the growing wealth inequality in the US, where the rapid increase in billionaires has not translated into benefits for a significant portion of the population. This widening gap fuels social polarization and undermines the democratic process, hindering progress towards reduced inequality. The loss of faith in institutions and the concentration of power in the hands of the uber-rich further exacerbates this issue.