mk.ru
AI in Media and Beyond: Capabilities, Concerns, and Regulation
Experts discuss the integration of AI in creative industries, highlighting its current limitations, societal risks, and regulatory challenges in Russia.
- How are people currently using AI in Russia, and what is the level of user satisfaction?
- In Russia, AI is primarily used for information retrieval (35%), text creation (25%), and image generation (20%). However, user satisfaction remains low, with only 40% reporting being satisfied with the results. This reflects the current stage of AI development, with AI being compared to a steam engine on an old carriage.
- What are the current limitations of AI, and how do these limitations impact its use in creative industries like media and filmmaking?
- Currently, AI struggles with goal-setting and understanding physical reality. This is evident in examples like AI-generated videos of rabbits on a trampoline, where the AI fails to accurately simulate physics. In creative industries, this leads to AI being a tool rather than a replacement for human workers, with human oversight still necessary.
- What are the potential long-term societal risks associated with increasing reliance on AI, and how is Russia addressing these concerns?
- A significant concern is the potential for AI to reduce human cognitive complexity, leading to a decline in human thinking abilities if humans over-rely on AI for problem-solving. While Russian lawmakers are hesitant to heavily regulate AI, there are discussions about regulation to prevent unintended consequences, recognizing the inherent unpredictability of human creativity that AI currently lacks.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of AI's impact on creative industries, acknowledging both the concerns of media workers and the optimistic perspectives of IT experts. The framing is neutral, presenting both sides without overt favoritism. However, the concluding focus on the potential for AI to make humans 'dumber' might subtly tilt the balance, although it is presented as a concern voiced by experts rather than the author's opinion.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. There's a descriptive tone, employing quotes from experts to support claims. Terms like "'parovoy dvigatel' v ogloblyakh ot telegi" (steam engine in cart shafts) are used figuratively but don't inherently carry a biased connotation. The use of the word "dumber" in the conclusion is slightly loaded, but this is mitigated by attributing it to experts' concerns.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including diverse viewpoints. While it presents the opinions of IT experts and a senator, perspectives from media workers facing potential job displacement could be strengthened. Additionally, the ethical implications of AI beyond the 'making humans dumber' aspect could be further explored. Given the article's length, however, some omissions may be due to space constraints.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the replacement of journalists with AI in Chinese media companies, leading to job losses and economic consequences. This directly impacts decent work and economic growth, particularly for media professionals. The low user satisfaction with AI-generated content also suggests potential negative impacts on the quality and value of work produced.