forbes.com
AI Kissing Apps: Social Media Ads Normalize Non-Consensual Deepfakes
Social media platforms like Meta and TikTok ran thousands of ads for AI apps that generate fake kissing videos of people without their consent, raising ethical concerns and potentially normalizing the creation of non-consensual intimate imagery.
- How do the AI kissing apps relate to the broader issue of deepfake technology and its potential for misuse?
- These AI kissing apps, similar to AI nudifier apps, create believable videos of people performing actions they did not consent to. Meta displayed over 2,500 ads, with about 1,000 currently active, while TikTok showed around 1,000 ads to millions of European users. This widespread advertising facilitates the normalization of deepfakes and potentially enables more graphic content creation.
- What are the long-term societal impacts of normalizing the creation and distribution of non-consensual intimate imagery through AI-powered apps?
- The ease of creating these deepfakes, coupled with the normalization through widespread advertising, poses a significant risk. This trend could lead to a surge in non-consensual deepfake pornography and other forms of image-based sexual abuse, especially considering the rise in AI-generated child sexual abuse material. The lack of adequate regulation and the global reach of these apps exacerbate the problem.
- What are the immediate implications of the widespread advertising of AI apps that generate non-consensual kissing videos on social media platforms?
- Meta and TikTok have run thousands of ads for apps that use AI to generate fake kissing videos of people, allowing users to upload photos of anyone and create videos of them kissing without consent. This normalizes the creation of non-consensual intimate imagery, raising serious ethical concerns.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently emphasizes the negative aspects and potential harms of AI kissing apps. The headline and opening paragraphs immediately highlight the exploitative nature and lack of consent, setting a negative tone that is sustained throughout the article. While this is important, a more balanced approach might have been to acknowledge the technology's existence before focusing on the ethical concerns.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, negative language like "exploitative," "creepy," and "deeply unethical" to describe the AI kissing apps. While accurate in many ways, this language intensifies the negative perception and may detract from a balanced presentation. More neutral terms like "concerning," "controversial," or "problematic" could be used in certain instances to create a less biased tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative impacts of AI kissing apps but omits discussion of potential benefits or alternative uses of the technology. It also doesn't explore the perspectives of the app developers or users who may not intend harm. While space constraints exist, the lack of counterpoints weakens the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by framing the issue as only having negative consequences, neglecting the possibility of the technology being used ethically or for other purposes besides the creation of non-consensual intimate images. It simplifies a complex issue.
Gender Bias
The article mentions several female celebrities whose images are used without consent in the AI kissing apps. While this highlights the issue of exploitation, the focus on female celebrities could be interpreted as reinforcing gender stereotypes about women's bodies and their susceptibility to sexual exploitation. More examples of men being targeted would provide a more balanced perspective.
Sustainable Development Goals
The creation and spread of AI-generated kissing videos without consent is a form of non-consensual sexual imagery. This directly violates the principles of bodily autonomy and consent, central to gender equality. The use of celebrities