Air India Flight 171 Crash: Survivor's Account Points to Engine Failure

Air India Flight 171 Crash: Survivor's Account Points to Engine Failure

smh.com.au

Air India Flight 171 Crash: Survivor's Account Points to Engine Failure

Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, crashed in Ahmedabad, India, killing over 240 passengers; the sole survivor reported flickering lights before impact, suggesting a possible dual engine failure, prompting an investigation and safety inspections.

English
Australia
TechnologyTransportPlane CrashAviation SafetyAir IndiaBoeing 787Engine Failure
Air IndiaGeneral Electric AviationDirectorate General Of Civil Aviation (India)National Transportation Safety Board (Ntsb)United AirlinesFlightglobalCranfield UniversityUniversity Of BathUniversity College BirminghamCathay Pacific
Viswash Kumar RameshDavid LearmountGuy GrattonAkhil BhardwajSambulo Matema
What evidence suggests engine failure as the primary cause of Air India Flight 171's crash?
Air India Flight 171 crashed in Ahmedabad, killing over 240 people. The sole survivor reported flickering lights before the crash, indicating a potential loss of power, possibly due to engine failure. Investigations are underway to determine the exact cause.
What are the broader systemic implications of this incident for aviation safety protocols and maintenance procedures?
The incident raises concerns about engine reliability and maintenance protocols for Air India's Boeing 787 fleet. The Indian aviation regulator has ordered enhanced inspections, including fuel system checks and power assurance tests, highlighting the potential for widespread systemic issues. Future investigations will need to determine if the engine failure was a singular event or points to a broader design or maintenance flaw.
What are the potential causes of a simultaneous dual engine failure in a modern airliner like the Boeing 787 Dreamliner?
The survivor's account of flickering lights suggests a power failure, likely originating from engine malfunction rather than a separate electrical issue. This aligns with the pilot's final message reporting "no thrust" and "losing power." The unusual nature of a simultaneous dual engine failure is a key focus of the investigation.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the narrative around the testimony of the sole survivor and the subsequent expert analysis focusing on engine failure. This emphasis, particularly in the opening paragraphs, guides the reader towards accepting engine failure as the primary cause before other possibilities are fully explored. The headline itself, while not explicitly biased, directs attention towards the survivor's testimony as a 'vital clue,' implicitly suggesting a specific direction for the investigation.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and objective, employing technical terms and quoting experts extensively. However, phrases like "miraculously walked away" (referring to the survivor) and "doomed AI 171 flight" could be considered slightly loaded, potentially influencing the reader's emotional response. More neutral alternatives might include 'survived' and 'Air India Flight 171.'

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the technical aspects of the plane crash, quoting numerous aviation experts. However, it omits potential perspectives from Air India, the aircraft manufacturer Boeing, or General Electric (the engine manufacturer). While acknowledging the limitations of space, exploring the official statements and investigations from these entities would provide a more complete picture and potentially offer alternative explanations or contributing factors. The lack of details regarding the ongoing investigation also limits the reader's ability to form a fully informed conclusion.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplified narrative by focusing primarily on engine failure as the likely cause, while acknowledging other possibilities like pilot error or bird strike. However, it doesn't thoroughly explore the interconnectedness of these potential factors. For instance, could a bird strike have triggered a chain reaction leading to engine failure? Presenting these possibilities as mutually exclusive rather than potentially contributing factors simplifies the complexity of the situation.

Sustainable Development Goals

Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure Negative
Direct Relevance

The Air India Flight 171 crash highlights potential risks within the aviation industry's infrastructure and technological systems. The incident raises concerns about aircraft engine reliability, safety protocols, and the effectiveness of maintenance procedures. Investigations into the cause of the crash, including potential engine failures and the role of electrical system malfunctions, directly impact the safety and reliability of air travel infrastructure.