repubblica.it
Airbnb Blames Hotels for EU Overtourism Crisis
Airbnb's report, "Overtourism in the EU," highlights that hotels drove nearly 80% of EU overnight stays in 2023-2024, exacerbating overtourism in top EU cities; the report urges a shift towards sustainable tourism models.
- What is the primary driver of overtourism in the top ten most visited EU cities, and what are its immediate consequences?
- Airbnb's report, "Overtourism in the EU," reveals that hotels accounted for nearly 80% of overnight stays in the EU in 2023-2024, and 75% of the over 200 million increase in overnight stays in the ten most visited EU cities between 2021 and 2023. This surge in hotel stays significantly contributes to overtourism, impacting local communities.
- How do cruise ship tourism and day-trippers contribute to overtourism in specific EU cities, and what are the resulting impacts?
- The report highlights that overtourism is not solely driven by hotels; cruise ship passengers and day-trippers also contribute significantly. However, the disproportionate growth of hotel capacity compared to residential housing exacerbates the issue, concentrating tourism in city centers and displacing local residents. This trend is particularly visible in cities like Barcelona and Amsterdam, with substantial increases in cruise passengers and day-trippers.
- What long-term strategies can mitigate overtourism while promoting sustainable tourism that benefits local communities and avoids concentrating tourism in city centers?
- The report suggests a future where urban planning prioritizes residential housing over hotels to mitigate overtourism. This shift requires a multifaceted approach, addressing the impact of cruise ships and day-trippers, and promoting alternative accommodation like Airbnb which fosters more dispersed tourism and benefits local communities.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The report is framed to highlight the negative impacts of hotels on overtourism. The headline and introductory paragraphs emphasize the "crushing impact" of hotels, setting a negative tone and prioritizing Airbnb's perspective. The use of statistics selectively focuses on the growth of hotel occupancy to support the argument. While other factors are mentioned, the overall framing heavily favors Airbnb's position.
Language Bias
The report uses strong, loaded language such as "crushing impact" and "overtourism is worsening." While the data presented supports some claims, the use of such emotionally charged terms introduces a bias. More neutral alternatives could include "significant impact" and "tourism increase." The repeated contrast between Airbnb and hotels also contributes to a biased tone.
Bias by Omission
The report focuses heavily on the negative impacts of hotels on overtourism, potentially omitting the contributions of other factors like cruise ships and day-trippers, although these are mentioned. The report also doesn't fully explore the potential benefits of hotel tourism, such as job creation and tax revenue for local governments. While acknowledging other contributing factors, the emphasis remains heavily weighted against hotels.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a somewhat false dichotomy by framing the choice as 'more housing or more hotels,' oversimplifying the complex relationship between tourism, housing needs, and urban planning. Other solutions, such as better infrastructure, improved tourism management, or sustainable tourism initiatives, are not adequately addressed.
Sustainable Development Goals
Airbnb's report highlights the negative impact of overtourism driven by hotels, particularly in densely populated city centers. The company advocates for a more distributed tourism model that utilizes existing housing stock, reducing strain on urban infrastructure and improving the quality of life for residents. Airbnb's approach, by providing accommodations outside city centers, helps alleviate overcrowding and promotes sustainable tourism practices, thereby contributing positively to Sustainable Cities and Communities.