arabic.euronews.com
Al-Quds Day 2024: Gaza Conflict Casts Shadow on Observances
Al-Quds Day, observed annually on the last Friday of Ramadan, takes on heightened significance this year due to the ongoing war in Gaza and restrictions on access to Al-Aqsa Mosque, impacting demonstrations and speeches globally.
- What are the most immediate impacts of the current Gaza conflict on this year's Al-Quds Day observances?
- Al-Quds Day", annually observed on the last Friday of Ramadan, holds exceptional significance this year amid escalating tensions in Gaza and the broader Middle East. Established in 1979 by Ayatollah Khomeini, it serves as a focal point for demonstrations and speeches across numerous countries, highlighting diverse Arab and Islamic stances on the Palestinian issue. This year's observance coincides with the ongoing war in Gaza, impacting demonstrations and access to Al-Aqsa Mosque.
- How do the restrictions on access to Al-Aqsa Mosque and the absence of key figures, such as Hassan Nasrallah, affect the significance and visibility of Al-Quds Day?
- The heightened importance of Al-Quds Day stems from the current conflict in Gaza, significantly shaping this year's events. Increased security measures by Israeli authorities restrict access to Al-Aqsa Mosque, while the ongoing war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza overshadow celebrations. The absence of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah's speech in Lebanon further underscores the impact of the conflict.
- What are the potential long-term geopolitical consequences of the changes observed during this year's Al-Quds Day, considering the ongoing conflict and shifting regional alliances?
- The future implications of Al-Quds Day are uncertain given the volatile geopolitical landscape. The ongoing conflict in Gaza and its ripple effects across the region could significantly alter the nature and intensity of future demonstrations. The absence of key figures like Nasrallah and the diminished role of Syria signify evolving alliances and power dynamics within the region.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently emphasizes the Iranian perspective and the challenges faced by its allies, portraying the event primarily through a lens of resistance to Israeli control. Headlines and emphasis on the Iranian supreme leader's statements contribute to this bias. The article's introduction highlights the significance of the event within the context of escalating tensions in Gaza, implicitly linking the two.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language in several instances. For example, referring to the Israeli government's actions as "restrictions" rather than "security measures" frames their actions negatively. Similarly, describing the Israeli actions in Gaza as "operations" when Palestinian groups often refer to them as aggression or attacks might present a biased perspective. The phrase "the Zionist entity" is a loaded term.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Iranian and Hezbollah perspectives, neglecting other significant viewpoints on the event, such as those of Palestinian factions not directly allied with Iran or those of the Israeli government. The perspectives of ordinary Palestinian citizens and their experiences are also underrepresented. The article mentions Israeli restrictions on access to Al-Aqsa Mosque but doesn't provide a balanced counterpoint from the Israeli government's perspective on security concerns.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between supporters and opponents of Israel's control over Jerusalem, overlooking the complexity of opinions and motivations within both groups. Many countries and individuals have nuanced positions that don't neatly fit into this binary.
Gender Bias
The article does not exhibit overt gender bias in its language or representation. However, it lacks specific details regarding gender participation in the events described, preventing a complete assessment.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the heightened tensions surrounding Jerusalem, and the restrictions imposed on Palestinian access to religious sites. These actions undermine peace, justice, and the rule of law, exacerbating existing inequalities and hindering efforts towards a just and lasting peace in the region. The conflict also impacts the stability of regional institutions and governance structures.