dw.com
Albania's Logging Moratorium: A Decade of Deforestation
In northern Albania, despite a 2016 moratorium, illegal logging continues, with companies like Alxhef exploiting loopholes to supply high-quality timber to international markets like Italy and the US, raising concerns about forest depletion and weak enforcement of regulations.
- What are the immediate consequences of weak enforcement of Albania's logging moratorium, and how does this impact the country's forest resources and international trade?
- Don't go there, a bear will eat you!" was the warning from four men we met in the village of Lekbibaj, Tropoja region, northern Albania. Our destination was Vrana e Madhe, where residents resisted illegal logging two years ago. Despite overexploitation, beech trees—highly sought in the timber industry—remain in Albanian forests. We observed numerous trucks loaded with massive logs and extensive cleared areas for vehicle transport, along with older and newer traces of mass logging.
- How do the business practices of companies like Alxhef and Minelli Spa contribute to the ongoing problem of illegal logging in Albania, and what role do public tenders play in this context?
- Albania's 2016 ten-year moratorium on commercial logging of native forests, valid until 2026, allows only firewood harvesting for households and public institutions. However, illegal logging persists, with many unregistered sawmills operating nationwide and companies abusing permits for firewood, harvesting high-quality beech trees instead. Local governments, responsible for forest control, claim sporadic illegal logging, contradicting widespread evidence.
- Considering the involvement of EU countries like Italy in the Albanian timber trade, what systemic changes are necessary in both Albania and the EU to ensure effective enforcement of regulations and sustainable forest management?
- The case of Alxhef, the sole bidder in a public tender for firewood harvesting in Lekbibaj, raises concerns. While Alxhef claims compliance, their decade-long partnership with the Italian company Minelli Spa, a major buyer of Albanian wood, indicates potential exploitation of the moratorium. The lack of transparency in the tender process, combined with Italy's weak enforcement of EU timber regulations, highlights systemic flaws that facilitate illegal logging and undermine sustainable forestry in Albania.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article is framed to highlight the failings of the Albanian government and the complicity of Italian companies in illegal logging. While presenting evidence of illegal activity, the narrative emphasizes the negative aspects and downplays the potential positive contributions of any stakeholders involved. The use of phrases such as "moratorium without effect" and "corruption chain" sets a negative tone from the outset. The article also presents the perspective of those who are critical of the system, giving less weight to counter-arguments or evidence of progress.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language that could be considered loaded or emotionally charged. For instance, phrases like "mass cutting of trees," "illegal logging," and "corruption chain" evoke strong negative emotions. While such language is partly justified by the gravity of the issue, more neutral alternatives could be used in some instances. For example, instead of "mass cutting of trees," the article could use "widespread deforestation." Similarly, "illegal logging activities" could be replaced by "unauthorised logging activities".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the illegal logging activities and the involvement of specific companies, but it lacks detailed information on the scale of the problem in relation to the total logging activity in Albania. It also omits information about government efforts beyond the moratorium and the involvement of local authorities, potentially minimizing the complexity of the issue. Furthermore, the article doesn't provide data on the volume of legally harvested wood versus illegally harvested wood, hindering a complete picture of the problem's magnitude. The lack of specific details about the implementation and enforcement of the EU Timber Regulation in Italy also weakens the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that the only solution to illegal logging is stricter enforcement of the moratorium. It overlooks other potential solutions such as promoting sustainable forestry practices, strengthening community involvement, and improving transparency in the timber industry. By framing the issue in this way, it simplifies a complex problem and limits the range of possible solutions.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights illegal logging in Albania, despite a ten-year moratorium. This undermines sustainable forest management, biodiversity conservation, and carbon sequestration, all crucial aspects of SDG 15 (Life on Land). The scale of illegal logging, the involvement of companies exploiting loopholes, and weak enforcement contribute to significant negative impacts. Quotes from forestry engineers and officials confirm the ongoing problem and ineffective enforcement.