es.euronews.com
Altamira Cave Paintings Dated to Over 30,000 Years Old
A new study using uranium-thorium dating reveals that the polychrome paintings in Spain's Altamira Cave are over 30,000 years old, predating previous estimates and challenging existing theories on the evolution of Paleolithic art. The research, involving an international team and published in the Journal of Archaeological Science (vol. 179, June 2025), confirms the coexistence of figurative and symbolic art during the early Upper Paleolithic in Iberia.
- How does the new dating of Altamira Cave's polychrome paintings (over 30,000 years old) change our understanding of early human artistic expression and cognitive capabilities?
- A revolutionary study has revealed that the iconic polychrome ceiling paintings in Altamira Cave are significantly older than previously believed, dating back over 30,000 years to the Gravettian period or earlier. This research, published in the Journal of Archaeological Science (vol. 179, June 2025), reshapes our understanding of Paleolithic art, establishing a new timeframe for these World Heritage expressions.
- What methodological advancements in uranium-thorium dating enabled the more precise dating of the Altamira Cave paintings, and how do these results challenge previous theories about the sequence of artistic styles?
- The study challenges the sequential theory suggesting symbolic art preceded figurative art, demonstrating their coexistence in early Upper Paleolithic Iberia. This discovery, based on uranium-thorium dating of calcite crusts, impacts our understanding of prehistoric art evolution and the cognitive abilities of our ancestors. The international 'First Art' project used advanced technology, including laser ablation, to achieve precise dating results (e.g., ALT22-SP1B: 32,790 ± 4,830 years).
- What are the long-term implications of this research for understanding the cultural and spiritual significance of Altamira Cave for Upper Paleolithic societies, and how might this influence future research on Paleolithic art?
- The findings highlight the longevity of artistic traditions in Altamira Cave, spanning millennia. The validated uranium-thorium dating method, applied with refinements like a more precise detrital 230Th/232Th activity value, provides reliable age estimates for both claviform signs and painted horses. This precision allows for a deeper understanding of cultural and spiritual significance for Paleolithic humans, while challenging previous assumptions about artistic development.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the new dating as a revolutionary breakthrough, emphasizing its impact on our understanding of Paleolithic art. The headline (if one were to be created) would likely focus on the increased age, potentially overshadowing other significant findings, like the coexistence of figurative and symbolic art. The emphasis on the 'First Art' project and international collaboration adds a layer of positive framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and factual, using terms like 'sophisticated technique' and 'precise data'. However, phrases such as 'revolutionary study' and 'impactful discovery' could be considered slightly loaded, though they are common in scientific reporting. More neutral alternatives would be 'significant study' and 'important discovery'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the new dating and methodology, potentially overlooking other relevant aspects of Altamira cave art or related archaeological discoveries. It doesn't discuss potential counterarguments to the new dating or limitations of the uranium-thorium dating method, which could impact the completeness of the analysis. While mentioning the 'First Art' project, it doesn't elaborate on the project's broader aims or other findings beyond the dating of the polychromes.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it could benefit from acknowledging the complexities of interpreting prehistoric art and the ongoing debates surrounding its meaning and creation. It presents a straightforward narrative of scientific discovery, which, while accurate in itself, might oversimplify the interpretive challenges involved.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article focuses on archaeological findings and does not directly relate to poverty reduction.