nrc.nl
Amal": Belgian Film Exposes Jihadist Influence Through School Bullying
Amal," a Belgian film by Jawad Rhalib, depicts a Brussels school teacher's struggle against homophobic bullying fueled by extremist ideology, highlighting the insufficient cinematic engagement with this issue in Europe and the insidious nature of jihadist influence within communities.
- What systemic changes are implied by "Amal" to effectively counteract the spread of extremist ideologies within communities and educational settings?
- Amal" suggests that while educational interventions are crucial, they are insufficient to counter the sophisticated and organized nature of jihadist indoctrination. The film implies a need for systemic societal changes to address the root causes of extremism and protect vulnerable youth from manipulation. The long-term impact could be a wider conversation on countering extremist narratives within educational systems.
- What are the immediate implications of the lack of European films addressing jihadism's role within Muslim communities, as highlighted by the film "Amal"?
- Amal," a new film by Jawad Rhalib, depicts the rise of Islamic homophobia in a Brussels classroom, highlighting the subtle yet dangerous infiltration of extremist ideologies within the Muslim community. The film underscores the lack of sufficient European cinematic engagement with this issue, showcasing the urgent need for open dialogue and counter-narratives.
- How does "Amal" connect the specific case of homophobia in a Brussels school to the broader issue of jihadist influence and the manipulation of Muslim youth?
- The film "Amal" connects the specific instance of anti-LGBTQ+ bullying in a Brussels school to the broader issue of jihadist influence, arguing that extremist groups use intimidation and violence to control the Muslim community. It reveals how seemingly moderate individuals can secretly incite hatred, demonstrating the insidious nature of such movements.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review frames the film as a necessary and timely intervention, highlighting its importance in addressing a previously neglected topic. The use of words like "alarmkreet" (alarm call), "kanker" (cancer), and "totalitaire indoctrinatie" (totalitarian indoctrination) emphasizes the urgency and severity of the problem, potentially influencing the reader's perception of the film's significance. The positive framing is further reinforced by recommending it for school screenings and classroom discussions, suggesting its educational value.
Language Bias
The review employs strong, emotive language to describe the film's subject matter and its impact. Words like "funeste rol" (funest role), "naargeestige sekte" (miserable sect), and "hersenspoelt" (brainwashes) are highly charged and could influence the reader's opinion. While these terms accurately reflect the reviewer's assessment, neutral alternatives could have been used to maintain a more objective tone. For instance, instead of "hersenspoelt", the reviewer could have used "influences".
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the film's portrayal of Islamic homophobia and jihadism within the Muslim diaspora, but it omits discussion of potential counterarguments or alternative perspectives on the issues raised. While acknowledging the film's late arrival in addressing these issues, it doesn't explore the reasons for this delay in cinematic representation, nor does it delve into the broader societal factors that contribute to the issues depicted. The limited scope might unintentionally overshadow other relevant aspects of the film or the complex socio-political context.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between those who support the film's message and those who oppose it (e.g., parents demanding censorship). While acknowledging the nuanced position of the school director, it doesn't thoroughly explore the complexities of balancing freedom of expression with potential community backlash or the internal conflicts within the Muslim community itself regarding these issues. The portrayal of the antagonist, Nabil, as a purely manipulative figure also simplifies the potential motivations of individuals involved in such movements.
Gender Bias
The review predominantly focuses on the female characters, Amal and Monia, while the male characters are portrayed more stereotypically. Amal is praised for her strength and progressive views, contrasting with the more villainized male characters, like Nabil. While this doesn't explicitly promote gender stereotypes, the unbalanced focus could unintentionally reinforce existing gender roles.
Sustainable Development Goals
The film "Amal" addresses the issue of homophobia within the Muslim community and the manipulative tactics employed by extremist groups to incite hatred and violence. By depicting these issues, the film contributes to raising awareness and promoting dialogue, which are crucial for building peaceful and inclusive societies. The film also highlights the importance of resisting extremist ideologies and protecting vulnerable individuals from persecution and violence.