Amalgam Filling Use in Germany Shows East-West Disparity Ahead of EU Ban

Amalgam Filling Use in Germany Shows East-West Disparity Ahead of EU Ban

welt.de

Amalgam Filling Use in Germany Shows East-West Disparity Ahead of EU Ban

The use of amalgam fillings in Germany decreased by 25% from 2021 to 2023, but a significant East-West disparity remains, with Mecklenburg-Vorpommern showing 11.2% usage versus 1.2% in Baden-Württemberg, ahead of a complete EU ban in 2025.

German
Germany
EconomyHealthGermany EuHealthcareAmalgamDental FillingsEast-West Divide
Barmer (German Health Insurance Company)Technische Universität Dresden
Michael Walter (Author Of Barmer Zahnreport)
How has the percentage of dental practices using amalgam fillings changed in Germany, and how does this vary regionally?
The EU-wide ban on amalgam fillings starting January 1, 2025, is driving this change. The disparity highlights regional variations in access to care and patient preferences. While over 80% of German dental practices are now amalgam-free, the proportion varies widely, reaching 48.2% in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.
What is the extent of the regional disparity in amalgam filling use in Germany, and what are the primary contributing factors?
In 2023, 3.5% of dental patients in Germany received amalgam fillings, a 25% decrease from 2021. However, a significant East-West disparity persists, with 11.2% in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern compared to 1.2% in Baden-Württemberg. This difference is likely due to financial factors and differing tolerances for amalgam's aesthetic and health drawbacks, as well as established treatment practices.
What are the potential long-term consequences of the amalgam ban on dental care access and quality, particularly concerning regional disparities and the performance of alternative materials?
The upcoming ban necessitates a focus on ensuring high-quality, affordable alternatives for all citizens. Continued monitoring of the regional disparities and the long-term performance of replacement materials is crucial. Further research is needed to fully understand the underlying factors influencing the East-West gap.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The headline and introduction immediately highlight the East-West disparity in amalgam fillings, potentially framing the issue as a problem primarily located in the East. This emphasis may overshadow the overall decrease in amalgam use nationally. The repeated mention of the disparity throughout the article reinforces this framing.

2/5

Language Bias

The article uses relatively neutral language. However, the repeated use of the term "umstritten" (controversial) in relation to amalgam fillings could be considered slightly loaded, as it implies controversy without explicitly stating the nature or extent of the opposing arguments. The use of "gravierendes Ost-West-Gefälle" (serious East-West gap) is also somewhat emotive.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the East-West disparity in amalgam fillings without exploring potential underlying socioeconomic factors that might contribute to this difference. It mentions financial aspects and adherence to established practices as possible reasons but doesn't delve into these factors with data or further analysis. For example, it doesn't discuss access to dental care, the distribution of dental professionals, or income disparities between East and West Germany. This omission limits the reader's ability to form a comprehensive understanding of the root causes.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between East and West Germany regarding amalgam use, without fully acknowledging the nuances within each region. While it highlights the significant differences in usage, it doesn't discuss the possibility of variation within the East and West regions themselves.