kathimerini.gr
Amazon Rainforest Deforestation Nears Irreversible Point
Over four decades, Brazil's Amazon rainforest has lost an area nearly the size of Spain, nearing an irreversible tipping point, according to MapBiomas data released on Monday, with deforestation reaching 15.3% in 2024.
- What is the extent of Amazon deforestation and its potential consequences?
- From 1985 to 2024, 49.1 million hectares (491,000 square kilometers) of the Amazon rainforest were lost, an area nearly the size of Spain. This deforestation threatens to reach a point of no return, disrupting rainfall cycles and potentially transforming large areas into savannas.
- How has land use changed in the Brazilian Amazon, and what role does this play in deforestation?
- The area used for livestock farming quintupled between 1985 and 2025, reaching 56.1 million hectares (561,000 square kilometers). This increase in agricultural activities, particularly cattle ranching, is a major driver of deforestation and contributes significantly to the loss of the rainforest.
- What are the implications of this deforestation for climate change, and what measures are being taken to address the issue?
- The Amazon rainforest plays a critical role in absorbing greenhouse gases, so its deforestation exacerbates climate change. While deforestation increased by 4% from August 2024 to July 2025 due to factors such as severe drought and fires, it has decreased since President Lula da Silva's return to power in January 2023, suggesting potential for mitigation through policy changes.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a concerning picture of Amazon deforestation, emphasizing the severity of the situation and the potential for irreversible damage. The use of phrases like "point of no return" and the comparison to the size of Spain immediately establishes a sense of urgency and scale. While this framing is arguably justified given the data, it could be argued that it leans towards alarmism, potentially overshadowing nuances in the situation. For example, the mention of Lula's efforts to curb deforestation is present but not emphasized in the same way as the negative statistics.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, employing factual descriptions and quotes from experts. However, the repeated use of terms such as "acρωτηριασμό" (mutilation) and "καταστροφικές πυρκαγιές" (destructive fires) contributes to a negative and alarmist tone. While these terms accurately reflect the severity of the situation, they could be softened slightly for a more balanced presentation. For example, instead of 'destructive fires', 'significant fires' could be used.
Bias by Omission
While the article provides substantial data on deforestation, it could benefit from including a more in-depth analysis of the underlying causes beyond agriculture and cattle ranching. The article mentions historical drought, but a more comprehensive exploration of economic factors, government policies, and international pressures would contribute to a more complete understanding. Additionally, perspectives from those involved in deforestation activities or those benefitting from it are absent, potentially skewing the narrative toward a solely environmentalist viewpoint. This omission is likely a result of space constraints but should be considered.
False Dichotomy
The article does not explicitly present a false dichotomy, but the strong emphasis on the negative aspects of deforestation could be interpreted as implicitly framing the situation as a binary choice between environmental catastrophe and inaction. This framing, while not explicitly stated, might overlook potential mitigating factors or intermediate solutions.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Amazon rainforest plays a crucial role in absorbing greenhouse gases. The deforestation described in the article directly contributes to climate change by reducing this carbon sink capacity. The article highlights a significant loss of forest cover, impacting the planet's ability to regulate its climate. The increase in deforestation due to agricultural activities, particularly cattle ranching, further exacerbates the issue. The quote, "When such large areas of vegetation are lost, the rainfall cycle is disrupted and extensive areas tend to transform into savannahs," directly illustrates the impact on climate patterns.