dw.com
"Ampel-Aus" Chosen as Germany's 2024 Word of the Year
The German Language Society (GfdS) selected "Ampel-Aus" ("traffic light out") as its 2024 word of the year, signifying the collapse of Germany's ruling coalition and the resulting announcement of early elections on February 23, 2025.
- What are the long-term implications of the "Ampel-Aus" crisis for German politics and its international relationships?
- The "Ampel-Aus" crisis underscores the fragility of coalition governments and the potential for unexpected political realignments. This event may influence future coalition-building strategies and political discourse in Germany, emphasizing the need for stronger inter-party cooperation.
- How does the selection of "Ampel-Aus" relate to previous "word of the year" choices, and what broader political trends does it reflect?
- The choice of "Ampel-Aus" as word of the year highlights a long-brewing political crisis, foreshadowed by 2023's "Ampelzoff" (traffic light fight). The simultaneous end of the Democratic presidency in the US further intensified the crisis, showcasing interconnected global political shifts.
- What is the significance of the German word "Ampel-Aus" being chosen as word of the year, and what are the immediate political consequences?
- "Ampel-Aus", meaning "traffic light out", signifies the collapse of Germany's governing coalition in 2024. The term reflects the German practice of naming coalitions by the colors of the participating parties. This unexpected dissolution led to the announcement of early elections in February 2025.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story around the linguistic analysis of the chosen words, focusing on the vocabulary choices and their significance within the German language. While this is a valid angle, it might indirectly downplay the political significance of the events themselves by prioritizing the linguistic lens. The selection of 'Ampel-Aus' is presented as a curious linguistic phenomenon rather than a direct commentary on the instability of the German government.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. The article employs descriptive language, explaining the terms in a clear and accessible manner. There is a slight tendency towards positive framing when referring to the "Word of the Year" initiative itself, but this doesn't appear to affect the overall objectivity of the analysis of the chosen words.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the linguistic aspects of the German "Word of the Year" choices, and doesn't delve into broader political or social contexts surrounding each term. While this is the article's focus, it omits potential deeper analyses of the political implications of each word and the events they represent. For example, the impact of the Ampel-Aus on German politics beyond the linguistic novelty is not discussed in detail. Similarly, the article briefly mentions the debate surrounding "kriegstüchtig", but doesn't elaborate on the various arguments for and against increased military spending.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the collapse of Germany's governing coalition, leading to political instability and anticipated early elections. This directly impacts the stability of political institutions and processes, hindering progress towards SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice for all and building effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.