
cnn.com
Amphipod Image Wins Ocean Photographer of the Year
Indonesia-based photographer Yury Ivanov's photograph of two three-millimeter amphipods on coral in Bali won the Ocean Photographer of the Year 2025 award from Oceanographic Magazine and Blancpain, beating over 15,000 submissions.
- What is the significance of Yury Ivanov's winning photograph?
 - Ivanov's photo highlights the often-overlooked beauty and fragility of underwater life. The win signifies the power of photography to connect people with the ocean and inspire conservation efforts, particularly given the global urgency of protecting ocean ecosystems.
 - What is the broader impact of the Ocean Photographer of the Year competition?
 - The competition uses photography as a tool to bridge the gap between people and the ocean, fostering understanding and appreciation which can translate into tangible conservation efforts. The exhibition's global reach ensures these crucial messages reach a broad audience.
 - What are some of the other winning photographs and what do they collectively represent?
 - Other winning photos include images of a personal watercraft navigating large waves in Nazaré, a pilot whale foetus under its dead mother, and a yellow pygmy goby releasing larvae. These diverse images collectively showcase the ocean's power, beauty, and vulnerability, emphasizing the need for conservation.
 
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a positive and celebratory framing of the winning photograph and the Ocean Photographer of the Year competition. The emphasis on the beauty and wonder of the underwater world, the photographer's skill and dedication, and the competition's mission to inspire ocean conservation creates a generally optimistic and uplifting tone. While this framing is not inherently biased, it could be argued that it downplays potential negative aspects of ocean life or environmental issues. The headline immediately focuses on the positive aspects of the winning image, 'Spellbinding image...wins award', which sets a positive tone from the start.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and descriptive, focusing on factual details and positive emotions. Terms like "spellbinding," "stunning," and "beautiful" are used, but they are applied to describe the visual aspects of the photographs, not to make judgments or express opinions about the subjects themselves. There is no overtly biased language present. For example, instead of saying 'haunting image', the writer could have said 'image depicting a whale foetus under its dead mother'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the winning photograph and the competition itself, but provides limited context regarding the broader challenges facing ocean conservation. While it mentions the ocean's "fragility" and the "planetary urgency," it does not delve into specific threats or discuss any conservation efforts in detail. This omission might leave the reader with an incomplete understanding of the issues at stake. There is no mention of the negative impact of human activities on the ocean, such as pollution or overfishing. More information could be included about the organizations involved and the initiatives to protect the ocean.
Sustainable Development Goals
The winning photograph and the competition itself raise awareness about ocean life and its fragility, directly contributing to SDG 14 (Life Below Water) by promoting ocean conservation and inspiring people to care for marine ecosystems. The images showcase biodiversity and the need for protection. The photographer's quote about celebrating the ocean's fragility and diversity directly supports this.