repubblica.it
Apple Reduces Emissions by 60% in 2024 While Increasing Revenue by 65%
Apple's 2024 Environmental Progress Report reveals a 60% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions since 2015, despite a 65% revenue increase, driven by increased recycled material use (99% rare earth magnets), renewable energy in its supply chain (17.8 GW activated), and carbon offsetting initiatives; the company aims for carbon neutrality by 2030.
- How does Apple's approach to sustainable materials affect its supply chain and broader environmental impact?
- Apple's progress is driven by a four-pronged approach: sustainable design and materials (using 99% recycled rare earth magnets and significant portions of recycled cobalt and lithium); renewable energy in the supply chain (activating over 17.8 GW of clean energy from suppliers); energy efficiency and industrial process improvements; and carbon offsetting through nature-based projects.
- What specific actions has Apple taken to reduce its carbon footprint, and what are the immediate quantitative results?
- In 2024, Apple reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by 60% compared to 2015, while simultaneously increasing revenue by 65%. This significant achievement, detailed in their latest Environmental Progress Report, highlights Apple's commitment to sustainability.
- What are the long-term challenges and opportunities for Apple in achieving its 2030 carbon neutrality goal, particularly concerning AI's increasing energy demands?
- Apple aims for carbon neutrality by 2030, extending renewable energy to its entire supply chain and pursuing the exclusive use of recycled or renewable materials by 2025. Their efforts, including the use of robots for material recovery and efficient packaging, are influencing industry-wide environmental practices.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Apple's environmental efforts very positively, highlighting its achievements and progress towards carbon neutrality. The headline and opening sentences emphasize the significant reduction in emissions and the ambitious goal. This positive framing, while accurate in presenting Apple's actions, might downplay the inherent challenges and complexities of achieving complete carbon neutrality within the tech industry. The article uses quantifiable metrics to support its claims, but the selection of these metrics leans towards showcasing positive results.
Language Bias
The language used is largely positive and celebratory, emphasizing Apple's successes. Words like "significant," "ambitious," and "innovative" are used frequently. While not overtly biased, the consistently positive tone could subtly influence the reader's perception, creating an impression that is more favorable than a purely neutral account might convey. More neutral alternatives could include phrases such as "substantial progress" instead of "significant achievement," and replacing 'ambitious' with 'challenging goal'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Apple's positive environmental initiatives and advancements, potentially omitting challenges or setbacks encountered during their sustainability journey. While it mentions the remaining 25% of emissions to be offset by 2030, it lacks detail on the potential difficulties or limitations of carbon removal projects. The overall impact of Apple's supply chain on the environment, beyond its direct efforts, is also not extensively discussed. This omission could lead to an overly optimistic view of Apple's overall environmental performance.
Sustainable Development Goals
Apple's significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (60% since 2015) while increasing revenue demonstrates substantial progress toward climate action. Their commitment to carbon neutrality by 2030, encompassing the entire product lifecycle, and initiatives like increased use of recycled materials, renewable energy in the supply chain, and carbon offsetting projects, directly contribute to mitigating climate change.