arabic.euronews.com
Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Deal Hinges on Constitutional Amendment
Azerbaijan's Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov stated that Armenia must amend its constitution removing territorial claims against Azerbaijan to finalize a peace agreement, criticizing the OSCE's Minsk Group for inaction and alleging Western attempts to undermine Azerbaijani efforts.
- What are the main obstacles preventing the signing of a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia?
- Azerbaijan's Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov recently stated that Armenia must amend its constitution to remove territorial claims against Azerbaijan to enable the signing of a peace agreement. He emphasized that Azerbaijan had extended a hand for reconciliation since 2021, but Armenia remained unresponsive for almost a year. The two countries engaged in negotiations for two and a half years, resulting in a preliminary agreement, but disagreements remain.
- What role has the Minsk Group played in the conflict, and why is Azerbaijan calling for its dissolution?
- Following a recent meeting, Azerbaijan and Armenia are still working to finalize a peace agreement. Key sticking points include Armenian constitutional provisions that claim Azerbaijani territory, according to Bayramov. He also criticized the Minsk Group, an OSCE body, for failing to achieve any results during its 30 years of involvement.
- What are the potential long-term implications of Azerbaijan's demand for constitutional changes in Armenia for regional stability and international relations?
- The ongoing dispute highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics in the South Caucasus. Azerbaijan's insistence on constitutional amendments reflects its determination to solidify territorial integrity, potentially impacting future regional stability and international relations. The rejection of the Minsk Group underscores a shift away from traditional mediation efforts towards bilateral negotiations.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative is framed to strongly favor the Azerbaijani viewpoint. The headline (if one were to be created based on this text) would likely emphasize Azerbaijan's role in peacemaking and Armenia's obstacles. The repeated use of quotes from the Azerbaijani minister, while providing detailed accounts of his statements, shapes the overall narrative towards Azerbaijan's perspective. The Armenian side is presented largely through Azerbaijani assertions and accusations, rather than direct statements or counter-arguments.
Language Bias
The Azerbaijani minister's language is presented without direct commentary. However, the repeated use of phrases like "three decades of Armenian occupation", "unresponsive for almost a year", and "attempts to thwart Azerbaijan's efforts", present a highly critical and accusatory tone towards Armenia. These are not neutral descriptions of events and could be seen as loaded language shaping the reader's perception.
Bias by Omission
The provided text focuses heavily on the Azerbaijani perspective, potentially omitting crucial details from the Armenian perspective regarding the peace agreement negotiations and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The Armenian justification for maintaining certain constitutional clauses or their response to Azerbaijani demands are largely absent, creating an unbalanced narrative. The omission of international perspectives beyond the Azerbaijani and potentially Western criticism might also affect the reader's understanding of the complexity of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as Azerbaijan offering peace while Armenia is solely responsible for impeding progress through its constitution. It ignores the possibility of mutual compromises or other factors contributing to the stalled negotiations. The statement that 'unless this clause exists, the signing of a peace agreement remains impossible' presents an oversimplification of the complex political and historical dynamics.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses peace negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The pursuit of a peace agreement and the resolution of territorial disputes contribute directly to SDG 16, promoting peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all, and building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.