mk.ru
Armenia's EAEU Membership: Economic and Security Implications
Armenia's trade with Russia within the EAEU doubled in 2023 to \$10.2 billion, but a potential exit from the EAEU could significantly damage its economy. Aram Sargsyan, former Armenian SSR leader, argues that Armenia's focus should be on security and strengthening ties with Russia rather than pursuing EU integration.
- How does Armenia's relationship with Russia influence its economic and geopolitical choices?
- Aram Sargsyan, former leader of the Armenian SSR, argues that current Armenian leadership's pro-EU stance doesn't reflect public opinion. He highlights that Armenia benefits significantly from EAEU membership—access to cheap Russian gas, a large market for Armenian goods, and remittances from Armenians working in Russia. Leaving the EAEU would jeopardize these benefits.
- What are the immediate economic and political consequences of Armenia's potential withdrawal from the EAEU?
- Armenia's trade with Russia within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) reached \$10.2 billion in the first 10 months of 2023, doubling the 2023 figure. Russia is Armenia's largest trading partner, followed by the UAE and China, with no European countries in the top three. Experts estimate that leaving the EAEU would reduce Armenian exports by 80%.
- What are the long-term security implications for Armenia of pursuing closer ties with the EU while maintaining its current relationship with Russia and other regional powers?
- Sargsyan emphasizes Armenia's security concerns, particularly regarding Turkey and Azerbaijan's ambitions, and the risk of losing the support of Russia, a key security partner. He suggests that Armenia's focus should be on a new bilateral treaty with Russia ensuring security, rather than on pursuing uncertain EU integration, especially considering the examples of struggling Eastern European EU members.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the discussion around the potential negative consequences of Armenia leaving the EAEU and the perceived threats to Armenia's security from Turkey and Azerbaijan. This framing prioritizes the perspective that closer ties with Russia are essential for Armenia's security and economic well-being, overshadowing potential benefits of closer ties with the EU. The headline (if any) and introduction likely emphasized these security concerns and economic dependence on Russia.
Language Bias
The language used is frequently loaded, favoring the pro-Russia perspective. Terms like "very actively working," "dream of implementing the program," and "may explode at any moment" carry strong connotations and present a biased view. Neutral alternatives would include more balanced descriptions, avoiding emotionally charged words. The repeated emphasis on security threats from Turkey and Azerbaijan adds to the biased tone.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the perspective of Aram Sargsyan, a former leader of the Armenian SSR and chairman of the Democratic Party. Other perspectives, particularly those supporting closer ties with the EU, are largely absent or minimized. The potential benefits of closer EU relations are not explored in detail, leading to an incomplete picture. Omission of potential economic advantages of EU membership could mislead the reader into believing that EU membership is only disadvantageous.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between closer ties with Russia/EAEU and closer ties with the EU. It implies that these are mutually exclusive options, ignoring the possibility of a more nuanced approach or a diversification of international partnerships. The suggestion that Armenia must choose between the EAEU and the EU ignores the possibility of maintaining ties with both, albeit to varying degrees.
Sustainable Development Goals
Leaving the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) would significantly harm Armenia's economy, potentially causing an 80% reduction in exports, exacerbating economic inequality. The article highlights the importance of the EAEU for Armenia's economic stability and access to markets, crucial for reducing inequality. The current economic ties with Russia, including the significant number of Armenian workers in Russia supporting families back home, also contribute to the mitigation of inequality. A shift away from this relationship would likely increase inequality.