azatutyun.am
Armenia's Ruling Party to Implement New Code of Conduct After MP Expulsions
Armenia's ruling Civil Contract party will create a new code of conduct for its members following recent controversies involving MPs Hovig Aghazaryan and Hakob Aslanyan, who were expelled for alleged leaks and ethical violations, and Karen Sarukhanyan, who underwent drug tests following a scandal.
- What prompted the ruling Civil Contract party in Armenia to develop a new code of conduct for its members?
- Following recent controversies involving its MPs, Armenia's ruling Civil Contract party will create a new code of conduct. The decision was made at a party meeting and announced by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Facebook, who stated the party needs to set higher ethical standards, formalized in the party's 7th congress.
- What specific behaviors led to the expulsion of Hovig Aghazaryan and Hakob Aslanyan from the Civil Contract party?
- This follows the expulsion of two MPs, Hovig Aghazaryan and Hakob Aslanyan. Aghazaryan's expulsion was due to alleged leaks of confidential information and ethical violations; Aslanyan's, due to serious disciplinary breaches and behavior inconsistent with the party's values. Aslanyan publicly defended Aghazaryan before his own expulsion.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the new code of conduct on the Civil Contract party's internal dynamics and its relationship with the media?
- The new code of conduct may address issues like information sharing with the media, potentially restricting MPs' freedom. The case of MP Karen Sarukhanyan, who underwent drug tests following a scandal, raises the question of whether mandatory drug testing will be included. The party's response to these incidents indicates a move towards stricter internal discipline.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction frame the story as the ruling party's response to recent scandals, potentially influencing the reader to perceive the new rules as primarily a damage control measure. The article's emphasis on the expulsion of members further reinforces this negative framing. A more balanced approach might explore the broader context of ethical standards in politics and the party's overall aims.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, though the repeated mention of "scandals" and the characterization of certain actions as "serious disciplinary violations" convey a negative tone. More neutral terms could be used, like "controversial incidents" or "policy infractions".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the actions and statements of the ruling party and its members, potentially omitting counterarguments or perspectives from opposition parties or independent analysts. The lack of information on the specific content of the new code of conduct, beyond general statements, also constitutes an omission. Further, the article does not delve into the legal framework for such a code or any potential challenges to its implementation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the ruling party's actions to establish higher ethical standards and the alleged actions of individual members. The nuanced realities of internal party dynamics and political motivations are not fully explored. The framing suggests that the new rules are a direct response to recent scandals, without exploring other contributing factors.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ruling party's decision to develop new rules of conduct aims to improve transparency and accountability within the party, potentially strengthening institutions and promoting justice. This is particularly relevant given recent scandals involving MPs leaking confidential information and allegations of drug use. The development of a code of conduct can lead to increased ethical standards, which supports SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions.