sueddeutsche.de
Arms Industry and the Sustainability Debate
The debate surrounding the classification of arms and defense investments as ESG-compliant is highlighted in this article, examining the political and ethical implications.
German
Germany
Germany InvestmentMilitary TechnologySustainabilityEthicsEsgArms
EuEsmaInnofactVerivoxLobbycontrol
Roland KölschAurel Eschmann
- How has the EU's decision on sustainable investments influenced the debate about ESG criteria?
- The EU's classification of nuclear and gas power as sustainable investments, despite environmental concerns, highlights the political flexibility of the term 'sustainability'. This decision was met with significant protests from environmental groups.
- Are there differing opinions based on gender concerning the sustainability of arms investments?
- A survey by Innofact shows a gender gap in opinions about the sustainability of arms investments, with nearly half of men approving compared to a third of women. This highlights a societal division regarding the ethical implications of such investments.
- What are the differing views on whether arms industry investments should be considered sustainable?
- There's considerable debate about whether ESG criteria should be adapted to accommodate arms industry investments. While some argue that it contributes to national security and stability, others view it as contradictory to the core principles of sustainability, potentially misleading investors.
- What is the main controversy surrounding the inclusion of the arms and defense sector in ESG investments?
- The inclusion of the arms and defense sector in ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investments is a current debate, driven by the changed geopolitical landscape. This is largely influenced by the war in Ukraine and a renewed emphasis on national defense.
- What are the ethical concerns and accusations of manipulation regarding the current push to include arms investments in ESG funds?
- Critics, like Aurel Eschmann of Lobbycontrol, argue that the push to include arms investments in ESG funds is driven by the industry's lobbying efforts and risks deceiving investors who seek truly sustainable investments. They suggest that the current situation exploits a temporary societal shift rather than representing a genuine sustainable investment.