npr.org
Army Orders Review of Books on DEI, Gender Ideology, and Critical Race Theory
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army Derrick Anderson ordered the removal of books promoting DEI, gender ideology, and critical race theory from Army libraries, including West Point, on April 9th; however, the order was later changed to 'flag' the books, pending a final decision by top Army officials; no books have been removed yet.
- What is the immediate impact of the Army's decision to review and potentially remove books on diversity, equity, and inclusion from its libraries?
- An April 9th memo from the acting Assistant Secretary of the Army ordered the removal of books promoting DEI, gender ideology, and critical race theory from Army libraries, including West Point. This directive was later modified to 'flag' rather than remove books, pending a final decision by top Army officials. No books have been removed from West Point as of yet.
- What are the broader implications of this action in the context of recent book removals from the Naval Academy and statements by Defense Secretary Hegseth?
- This action follows the removal of nearly 400 books from the U.S. Naval Academy due to similar concerns. The Army's decision reflects a broader debate about the role of DEI initiatives and potentially controversial viewpoints within military institutions. This has prompted concern from lawmakers who cite similarities to McCarthy-era censorship.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of this policy shift on diversity and inclusion initiatives within the military, and what challenges might this approach create?
- The ongoing review of books within Army libraries, coupled with the prior actions at the Naval Academy, signals a potential shift in the military's approach to inclusivity and diversity training. The long-term effects may include altered curriculum, changes in library holdings, and potentially, legal challenges. The final decision on book removals will set a precedent for other institutions.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story primarily from the perspective of those critical of the book removals, giving greater emphasis to their concerns and framing the actions of the Army as potentially censorious and McCarthyist. The headline and introduction focus on the removal of books and the negative reaction to this policy. This framing may shape the reader's understanding of the situation by highlighting the opposition and potentially downplaying the reasons behind the Army's actions.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language such as "alarming return to McCarthy era censorship" and "single dumbest phrase in military history." These phrases are subjective and inflammatory and could be replaced with more neutral alternatives such as "concerns about censorship" and "criticism of the phrase." The use of the term "subverts meritocracy and unity" is also a loaded phrase with strongly negative connotations.
Bias by Omission
The article omits the potential perspectives of those who support the removal of the books, focusing primarily on the concerns and criticisms of those opposing the action. It doesn't include statements from the Assistant Secretary of the Army or other proponents of the book removal policy, limiting a balanced understanding of the rationale behind the decision. The article also lacks specific details on the criteria used to identify books for removal or flagging, leaving room for interpretation and speculation about potential bias in the selection process.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the issue as a conflict between "meritocracy and unity" and the promotion of DEI, gender ideology, and critical race theory. This simplification ignores the nuanced arguments that these concepts can contribute to a more inclusive and equitable environment, which may also foster unity and meritocracy. It doesn't explore the possibility of finding balance or addressing potential concerns regarding DEI materials constructively.
Gender Bias
The article does not exhibit significant gender bias in terms of representation or language. While it mentions both male and female lawmakers who expressed concern, it does not focus disproportionately on gender or use gendered language in a biased way.
Sustainable Development Goals
The removal of books focusing on DEI, gender ideology, and critical race theory from Army libraries, including West Point, limits access to diverse perspectives and educational resources, hindering inclusive education and potentially impacting the development of critical thinking skills among cadets and personnel. This action contradicts efforts to promote inclusive and equitable education.