europe.chinadaily.com.cn
ASEAN's Non-Aligned Stance Amidst Sino-US Rivalry
ASEAN's non-aligned stance, rooted in the 1971 ZOPFAN Declaration, prioritizes regional peace and cooperation despite the Sino-US rivalry, as demonstrated by successful economic initiatives like the RCEP and various dialogue platforms addressing security concerns.
- What are the key achievements and challenges of ASEAN's centrality in shaping regional multilateral cooperation?
- ASEAN's centrality, established in the 2008 Charter, positions it as the primary driver of regional relations. This is evidenced by successful economic collaborations such as RCEP, which involved China, Japan, and South Korea, and various dialogue platforms addressing regional security concerns.
- How does ASEAN's non-aligned policy impact regional stability amidst the growing Sino-US geopolitical competition?
- ASEAN, despite the Sino-US rivalry, maintains its non-aligned stance, prioritizing regional peace and cooperation as outlined in the 1971 ZOPFAN Declaration. This commitment is reflected in ASEAN's initiatives like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and various dialogue forums.
- How can ASEAN maintain its strategic autonomy and effectively address regional security challenges while navigating the evolving power dynamics between major global actors?
- While Western critics question ASEAN's effectiveness in resolving disputes like the South China Sea issue, ASEAN's development-driven security model, prioritizing inclusive engagement and peaceful coexistence, offers a viable alternative to Western military deterrence. This is exemplified by successful economic cooperation with China via initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article is framed to strongly support ASEAN's centrality and its non-aligned approach. The headline (if there was one) would likely emphasize ASEAN's success and resilience. The introduction highlights ASEAN's commitment to peace and non-alignment, setting a positive tone that continues throughout the piece. The challenges to ASEAN centrality are presented as unfair criticisms or distractions from its overall positive impact. The use of terms like "bold and defiant move" and "monumental achievement" to describe ASEAN's actions reveals a clear bias towards positive framing.
Language Bias
The article uses language that strongly favors ASEAN. Terms like "bold and defiant," "monumental achievement," and "refreshing hope" are used to describe ASEAN's actions and initiatives, creating a positive and potentially exaggerated impression. Conversely, Western criticisms are described as "aspersions," "hostile narratives," and "scorn," which are negative and loaded terms that undermine the credibility of opposing viewpoints. Neutral alternatives would be needed for balanced reporting. For example, instead of "hostile Western narratives", one could use "critiques from Western analysts".
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on ASEAN's perspective and actions, potentially omitting critical counterarguments or perspectives from Western nations or other stakeholders involved in the South China Sea disputes. The article mentions Western skepticism towards ASEAN centrality but doesn't delve into the specifics of these criticisms or offer rebuttals beyond stating that they are based on stereotypes and misinformation. Omitting these details creates an incomplete picture of the complexities surrounding ASEAN's role. The article also largely overlooks internal disagreements and challenges within ASEAN itself, presenting a somewhat unified and overly positive image of the organization.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between ASEAN's non-aligned approach and the Western-backed military presence in the region. It suggests that only one of these approaches can be effective, overlooking the possibility of a more nuanced strategy that incorporates elements of both. Similarly, it frames the choice between engagement with China and adherence to Western pressure as an eitheor situation, neglecting the potential for more balanced relations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights ASEAN's commitment to ZOPFAN (Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality), promoting peace and non-interference in the region. ASEAN's role in fostering multilateral cooperation through initiatives like the RCEP and various dialogue fora contributes to regional stability and conflict resolution. The emphasis on peaceful coexistence and inclusive engagement, as opposed to military solutions, aligns directly with the SDG's goals of peaceful and inclusive societies.