nrc.nl
Ashkelon Family's Experience During October 2023 Hamas Attacks
The Gabay family, living in Ashkelon, Israel, near the Gaza Strip, endured the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, sheltering in their safe room, witnessing a rocket strike on a neighbor's house, and later evacuating for a month due to the ongoing conflict, illustrating the immediate impact on civilians.
- What were the immediate consequences of the October 2023 Hamas attack on the Gabay family and their community in Ashkelon?
- The Gabay family, residing in Ashkelon near the Gaza Strip, experienced the October 2023 Hamas attack firsthand, seeking shelter in their safe room as rockets fell nearby. Their home was spared, though a neighbor's house was hit, and they later evacuated to Netanya for a month due to the ongoing conflict. This illustrates the immediate impact of the conflict on civilians in southern Israel.
- How did the Gabays' experience reflect broader patterns of displacement and fear among Israeli civilians during the conflict?
- The Gabays' experience reflects the widespread displacement and fear experienced by many Ashkelon residents during the October 2023 conflict. Their decision to evacuate, mirroring that of many others, highlights the disruption and insecurity caused by the Hamas attacks. The family's proximity to the Gaza Strip makes them particularly vulnerable to cross-border violence.
- What are the long-term implications of the October 2023 conflict on Israeli public opinion and the prospects for peace in the region?
- The Gabays' hardened stance towards Palestinians following the Hamas attacks reveals a shift in public opinion in Israel. Their lack of empathy and desire for the relocation of Gazans, coupled with their support of the Israeli military response, points to increasing polarization and diminished prospects for peace in the region. The family's support for Netanyahu despite initial concerns also illustrates shifting political sentiments.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative is framed predominantly from the perspective of the Gabay family, emphasizing their fear, anxieties, and experiences during the conflict. This framing shapes the reader's understanding of the situation by prioritizing the Israeli narrative and potentially downplaying the experiences of Palestinians. The headline (if any) would likely influence this framing further, and the opening paragraph immediately establishes a focus on the family's experiences. This could shape readers' perceptions from the start to center on the family's situation rather than the broader conflict.
Language Bias
The article uses charged language that reinforces negative stereotypes about Palestinians. Terms like 'terror', 'haat jegens Joden' (hatred of Jews), 'plaats van terreur' (place of terror) are used without qualification or counter-arguments. The descriptions of the bombing sounds as 'muziek in mijn oren' (music in my ears) and a 'verdiende terugbetaling' (deserved payback) are highly emotive and inflammatory, lacking the objectivity expected in journalistic reporting. Neutral alternatives could include referring to the sounds of bombing as 'the sound of explosions' or simply describing the family's emotional reactions to the events, without resorting to overly charged descriptions.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Gabay family's experiences and perspectives, omitting broader perspectives from Palestinians in Gaza and potentially minimizing the suffering and losses experienced by them. The article mentions Palestian deaths in passing but does not offer detailed accounts or perspectives on their experiences during the conflict. The article also omits mention of potential Israeli human rights violations and the impact of the conflict on the environment and infrastructure of Gaza.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a stark dichotomy between Israelis and Palestinians, portraying the conflict as a simple struggle between good and evil, rather than a complex geopolitical issue with multiple contributing factors and varying perspectives. The Gabay family's views are presented as representative of all Israelis, overlooking internal dissent and diverse opinions within Israeli society regarding the conflict and its handling. The simplistic view that Palestinians are inherently violent and driven by hatred simplifies a complex situation with deeper historical and socio-political causes.
Gender Bias
While both Mayan and Noam are quoted, their viewpoints often reinforce the family's predominantly masculine-oriented narrative. Mayan's outburst about Gazans relocating is given prominence but is not critically examined within the wider context of the conflict's complexities. The article focuses on the father's perspective, using him as the primary spokesperson for the family, potentially minimizing Mayan's contributions and insights. More balanced representation and detailed analysis of the female perspective would improve the article.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, characterized by violence, displacement, and a lack of trust between the two sides. The Gabay family's experiences, including their displacement and the loss of their neighbors' home, exemplify the fragility of peace and the breakdown of institutions in the region. The family's hardened views towards Palestinians and their lack of empathy reflect the deep-seated divisions and the absence of justice perceived by many Israelis. The conflict significantly hinders progress toward sustainable peace and justice.