Asian Nations Diversify Trade Amidst US Tariff Hikes

Asian Nations Diversify Trade Amidst US Tariff Hikes

lexpress.fr

Asian Nations Diversify Trade Amidst US Tariff Hikes

Facing new US tariffs ranging from 20% to 40%, Asian nations like Vietnam, Japan, and Indonesia are diversifying trade, with China shifting exports to Southeast Asia and the EU forging closer ties with Indonesia to alleviate trade barriers.

French
France
International RelationsEconomyTariffsTrade WarGlobal EconomyUs-China TradeAsiaAsean
AseanEu Commission
Donald TrumpUrsula Von Der LeyenPrabowo SubiantoAnwar Ibrahim
What are the immediate economic consequences for Asian nations following the US imposition of new tariffs?
Facing increased US tariffs, Asian nations are diversifying trade partners. Vietnam secured a deal for 20-40% tariffs, while others face 20-40% increases by August 1st. This shift reflects a broader trend of nations seeking alternative trade routes and alliances.
What are the long-term implications of this trade conflict for global economic stability and the formation of new trade alliances?
The ongoing US trade disputes highlight the growing instability in global trade. This instability is prompting nations to strengthen alliances and explore new trade routes to mitigate economic risks. The EU's agreement with Indonesia suggests a trend towards regional trade blocs to offset the disruption caused by unilateral trade policies.
How have countries responded to the increased tariffs imposed by the US, and what strategies are they employing to mitigate the impact?
The US trade war has spurred significant shifts in global trade patterns. China, for instance, has redirected exports toward Southeast Asia, increasing its share of exports to the region from 49% to 51% between December 2024 and May 2025. Simultaneously, the EU has become a more attractive partner, as seen in the recent trade deal with Indonesia.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the trade war largely from the perspective of Asian countries reacting to Trump's actions. While this is a valid perspective, it could benefit from a more balanced approach considering the motivations behind Trump's policies and the US perspective on the situation. The headline could also be less alarmist.

2/5

Language Bias

The article uses strong language such as "tonitruante" (thundering) and phrases like "salve de courriers" (volley of letters) to describe Trump's actions, creating a negative connotation. More neutral language, such as "significant" or "substantial," could be used to convey the information objectively.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the impact of Trump's trade war on Asian economies and their responses, but omits discussion of the perspectives and actions of other affected regions or countries outside of Asia. The impact on US businesses and consumers is also largely absent. This omission limits the scope of understanding of the overall global impact of the trade war.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between adapting to the new tariffs and continuing traditional trade with the US. While it acknowledges the shift to new trading partners, it doesn't explore the complexities of maintaining some level of trade with the US while diversifying.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article focuses primarily on male political leaders (Trump, Anwar Ibrahim, Prabowo Subianto, etc.) and doesn't specifically mention the roles or perspectives of women in government or business involved in responding to the trade war. This bias in sourcing could skew the understanding of the overall response to the economic challenges.

Sustainable Development Goals

Decent Work and Economic Growth Negative
Direct Relevance

The imposition of tariffs by the US disrupts global trade, impacting economic growth and potentially leading to job losses in affected countries. Countries are forced to seek new trade partners and adapt to the changing economic landscape, which can be costly and time-consuming. The quote from Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim highlights the negative impact of these trade policies: "À travers le monde, les outils autrefois utilisés pour créer de la croissance sont aujourd'hui exercés pour faire presser, isoler et contenir". This reflects a shift from growth-oriented policies to protectionist and isolating measures.