elmundo.es
Asteroid 2024 YR4 Impact Probability Rises to 2.3%
The probability of asteroid 2024 YR4 (discovered December 27, 2023) impacting Earth on December 22, 2032, is now 2.3%, prompting UN activation of the Planetary Security Protocol; the asteroid, over 50 meters in diameter, will be observable until April, with further analysis by the James Webb telescope.
- What is the current probability of asteroid 2024 YR4 impacting Earth in 2032, and what actions have been taken in response?
- The probability of asteroid 2024 YR4 impacting Earth on December 22, 2032, has risen to 2.3%, prompting the UN to activate the Planetary Security Protocol for the first time. The asteroid, over 50 meters in diameter, was discovered on December 27 and will be observable until April.
- How has the predicted probability of impact changed since the asteroid's discovery, and what factors contribute to the uncertainty?
- Recalculations of 2024 YR4's trajectory show an increasing likelihood of impact, rising from 1.2% to 2.3% in a short time. This surpasses the probability of winning the Spanish Christmas lottery or being struck by lightning. The asteroid's potential impact zone includes the eastern Pacific Ocean, North America, the Atlantic Ocean, Africa, the Arabian Sea, and South Asia.
- What are the potential consequences of an impact, and how will future observations using the James Webb telescope affect the risk assessment?
- The James Webb telescope will provide more precise measurements of 2024 YR4's size and composition by April, potentially reducing impact probability to zero. If the asteroid's diameter exceeds 50 meters and impacts a populated area, the consequences could be catastrophic, similar to the 1908 Tunguska event. Educational campaigns are planned to address public misconceptions.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article uses alarming language and emphasizes the increasing probability of impact to create a sense of urgency and potential catastrophe. Headlines and the opening sentence immediately highlight the elevated risk, setting a negative and alarming tone. This framing prioritizes the worst-case scenario and downplays the potential for a successful mitigation or the low probability of the impact compared to other risks.
Language Bias
The article employs language that amplifies the sense of risk and threat. Phrases like "arrasó una extensión similar a la isla española de Gran Canaria" and "esa zona desaparecería del mapa" are emotionally charged and contribute to an overall tone of fear. More neutral phrasing could include descriptions emphasizing the scientific data and the efforts to understand the asteroid's trajectory and potential impact.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the potential impact and risk of the asteroid, but omits discussion of the resources and international collaborations dedicated to planetary defense. It also doesn't mention the potential benefits of studying asteroids up close, like advancing our understanding of the early solar system. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, a brief mention of these counterpoints would have provided a more balanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by focusing primarily on the catastrophic scenario of an asteroid impact. While acknowledging the possibility of a reduced risk by April, it doesn't adequately explore other potential outcomes or mitigation strategies beyond simply waiting for more data. The narrative strongly implies an "impact or no impact" scenario without fully addressing the complexities involved.