kathimerini.gr
Attica Bank Reports Profit Despite Securitization Loss, Thrivest Holding Takes Majority Stake
Attica Bank, after merging with Pankriti Bank, reported €43.9 million recurring operating profit in 2024, but a €325.5 million net loss due to a loan securitization. A €735 million capital increase raised its capital adequacy ratio to 11.9%, and Thrivest Holding became its majority shareholder (54.6%).
- How did the securitization of non-performing loans and the capital increase impact Attica Bank's financial ratios and overall standing?
- This securitization significantly reduced Attica Bank's non-performing loan ratio to 2.8% from 54.1% in Q3 2024, improving its financial health. A €735 million capital increase boosted the capital adequacy ratio to 11.9%, exceeding regulatory requirements by 320 basis points.
- What are the long-term strategic goals of Attica Bank following its merger and privatization, and what challenges might it face in achieving them?
- The successful merger with Pankriti Bank created Greece's fifth-largest bank by assets, focusing on supporting the real economy. Further strengthening its position, Attica Bank completed privatization with Thrivest Holding as the majority shareholder (54.6%), and the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund (HRADF) holding 36.2%. Future plans include network optimization, IT system integration, and a voluntary redundancy program to improve the cost-to-income ratio.
- What were the key financial results of Attica Bank in 2024, and what is their immediate significance for the bank's stability and future prospects?
- Attica Bank reported recurring operating profits of €43.9 million in 2024, significantly up from €21.9 million in 2023, following its merger with Pankriti Bank. However, a €325.5 million loss resulted from the securitization of €3.6 billion in non-performing loans via the "Hercules" state guarantee scheme.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the merger with Pancretian Bank and the subsequent restructuring as overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing the increased size and market share of the combined entity. The headline (if there was one) likely highlighted the successful merger and improved financial standing, possibly overshadowing the significant losses resulting from the non-performing loan portfolio. The use of phrases like "significant year", "5th largest bank", and "successful merger" reinforce this positive framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral but contains some positively loaded terms. Words like "successful," "significant," and "improved" are used frequently to describe the bank's performance, potentially influencing reader perception. Consider replacing these with more neutral terms like "achieved," "substantial," or "notable." Additionally, framing the 325.5 million euro loss as a consequence of a positive action (titling of loans) may be considered a form of bias.
Bias by Omission
The provided text focuses heavily on the financial performance and restructuring of Attica Bank, potentially omitting social or environmental impacts of the bank's activities. There is no mention of the bank's approach to sustainability, its impact on local communities, or any ethical considerations related to its lending practices. This omission could leave out crucial aspects of the bank's overall performance and influence.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the bank's success, highlighting the positive aspects of its financial performance while downplaying the significant losses incurred due to the 'Hercules' program. While the restructuring is framed as positive, the large loss might lead readers to overlook potential challenges or risks associated with the bank's future.
Sustainable Development Goals
The merger of Attica Bank and Pancretian Bank created the 5th largest bank in Greece, supporting the real economy and offering banking solutions to businesses and individuals. The increase in lending and deposits, along with job creation (despite a voluntary redundancy program), all contribute positively to economic growth and decent work. However, the voluntary redundancy program also presents a negative aspect to the decent work part of the SDG.