repubblica.it
Bach's Paradox: Influence vs. Appreciation
The European Year of Music centers on Bach, despite the limited public understanding of his complete works, highlighting the contrast between his profound influence on subsequent composers and the infrequent performance of his major compositions.
- How has the historical reception of Bach's music shaped its current performance practices and pedagogical use?
- Bach's enduring presence in churches and private collections contrasts with the limited exposure of his most significant works in public performances. While his music heavily influences other composers, the public's engagement remains largely indirect, via transcriptions and adaptations rather than direct experience of his original compositions.
- What is the main reason for the discrepancy between Bach's historical influence and his limited public appreciation?
- The European Year of Music highlights Johann Sebastian Bach, alongside Handel and Scarlatti, but focuses primarily on Bach. Handel's work was largely overlooked due to historical criticism, while Scarlatti's was relegated to introductory concert pieces. Consequently, only Bach enjoys widespread, albeit limited, popularity.
- What are the key challenges to achieving a truly comprehensive and insightful celebration of Bach's music in the present day?
- The pedagogical use of Bach's works, particularly in music schools, often overshadows their artistic merit. Students focus on technical aspects like counterpoint, neglecting the expressive and poetic qualities. This, along with inconsistent performance practices, hinders a genuine appreciation of Bach's full genius, a problem exacerbated by the frequent use of modern instruments inappropriate for many of his pieces.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Bach's legacy through a lens of under-appreciation and misuse, emphasizing the shortcomings of past and present interpretations. The headline (if any) and introduction likely reinforce this negative framing. The frequent use of words like "degradato" (degraded) and "sfruttamento" (exploitation) reinforces this negative slant. The focus on negative interpretations overshadows potential positive aspects of Bach's reception and influence.
Language Bias
The author uses loaded language such as "feticcio" (fetish), "trascurammo" (we neglected), "degradò" (degraded), and "sfruttamento" (exploitation) to express a negative view of Bach's reception. More neutral alternatives might include "under-appreciated," "overlooked," "limited engagement", and "selective use." The repeated emphasis on negative aspects creates a predominantly pessimistic tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Bach's limited public reception and neglect of his lesser-known works, omitting discussion of broader cultural impact or influence on subsequent composers beyond mentioning a few examples (Chopin, Schumann). The lack of analysis on his influence on musical forms or theoretical advancements presents a significant omission. The article also omits counterarguments to its central thesis, potentially creating a biased perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article sets up a false dichotomy between Bach's technical mastery and his creative genius, implying that an appreciation for one excludes the other. This oversimplifies the complexity of Bach's compositional achievements and the diverse ways his music can be experienced.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the insufficient understanding and appreciation of Bach