lexpress.fr
Bangladesh Textbook Revisions Spark Controversy After Government Change
Following the August 2024 fall of Sheikh Hasina's government in Bangladesh, the interim government revised 441 school textbooks from primary to secondary levels, altering the portrayal of historical figures and sparking controversies regarding the balance and inclusivity of historical accounts.
- How did the change in government in Bangladesh in August 2024 directly impact the country's school textbooks, and what are the immediate consequences of these changes?
- Following the August 2024 fall of Sheikh Hasina's government in Bangladesh, the interim government revised 441 textbooks, altering the portrayal of historical figures like Ziaur Rahman, whose role in the 1971 independence war was reinstated. This revision sparked controversy, with some praising the restored balance and others criticizing the government's susceptibility to political pressure.
- What are the underlying causes of the recurring revisions of historical narratives in Bangladeshi textbooks, and how do these revisions reflect broader political and social conflicts?
- The textbook revisions reflect a long-standing political battle over historical narratives in Bangladesh, where the depiction of national figures shifts with regime changes. The current changes, while attempting to present a more balanced account, illustrate the ongoing struggle to reconcile competing interpretations of the country's history and the sensitivity surrounding national identity.
- What are the long-term implications of the politically influenced revisions of history textbooks for the development of a cohesive national identity and the understanding of Bangladesh's past in future generations?
- The revisions, while aiming for a more inclusive history, also demonstrate the vulnerability of educational materials to political manipulation and social pressure. The removal of Adivasi people from a textbook cover and the omission of a reference to the Hijra community highlight how competing narratives and social sensitivities can influence the content of educational materials and shape public understanding of history. The future stability of historical narratives in Bangladeshi education remains uncertain.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the textbook revisions through the lens of political battles and power struggles, highlighting the conflicting viewpoints of different political factions. The introduction emphasizes the history of changing narratives and the impact on public perception, which guides the reader's understanding of the issue.
Language Bias
The article generally uses neutral language, avoiding overtly loaded terms. However, phrases like "feroce bataille politique" (fierce political battle) and "remise au goût politique du jour" (putting back in line with the political taste of the day) subtly convey a sense of conflict and manipulation, which might influence reader perception. The term "purges" when describing the killings of intellectuals is loaded. A more neutral term such as "killings" or "executions" would be preferable.
Bias by Omission
The article omits the specific names of Islamist groups responsible for the killings of intellectuals, mentioning only that responsibility is attributed to Islamist groups, thus potentially downplaying the role of specific organizations and limiting a complete understanding of the events. The article also briefly mentions the removal of Adivasi people from a textbook cover photo, but lacks detail on the broader implications and the reasons behind the initial inclusion and subsequent removal.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the changes to history textbooks as a choice between constantly changing narratives and a static, unchanging version. The reality is likely far more nuanced, with possibilities for regular updates and revisions that balance accuracy and political neutrality.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the politicization of history education in Bangladesh, where textbooks are altered to reflect the political agenda of ruling governments. This constant revisionism undermines the integrity of education, prevents students from receiving a balanced and accurate understanding of their history, and fosters political bias in the curriculum. The changes, driven by political motivations rather than educational needs, negatively impact the quality of education and the development of critical thinking skills in students. The removal and addition of historical figures based on political affiliations further distorts historical narratives. The violent conflicts arising from these revisions, as exemplified by the student injured for defending the inclusion of Adivasi people in a textbook, highlight the negative impact on the learning environment.