sueddeutsche.de
Battle for Kordofan Deepens Sudan's Divisions
The Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) are fiercely battling for control of Kordofan, a central Sudanese region, exacerbating the country's deep divisions and causing the largest refugee crisis in modern times, exceeding 12 million displaced people.
- What is the strategic significance of the ongoing conflict in Kordofan, and what are its immediate consequences for Sudan?
- The Sudanese army, led by General Burhan, and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), commanded by Hemeti, are engaged in intense fighting in Kordofan, a strategically important region connecting East and West Sudan. This follows setbacks for the RSF in Khartoum, indicating the conflict's continuation despite previous events. The battle for Kordofan highlights Sudan's deep divisions, with the army controlling eastern regions and the RSF dominating Darfur.
- What are the long-term implications of the conflict in Kordofan for the future political and territorial divisions of Sudan?
- The ongoing conflict in Kordofan foreshadows a potentially partitioned Sudan, similar to Libya. The RSF's control of Darfur and the army's struggles to maintain its positions, compounded by the RSF's external support (UAE weapons supplies), suggest a lasting division. The use of Kordofan as a battleground underscores the strategic importance of this central region and its potential role in future negotiations, where territorial control will be a critical bargaining chip.
- How are the actions of the RSF and the Sudanese army in Kordofan impacting the civilian population and contributing to the humanitarian crisis?
- Control of Kordofan is crucial for both sides; it's vital for the army to advance on Darfur and for the RSF to potentially retake Khartoum. The conflict's brutality, including massacres attributed to the RSF, has created Sudan's largest refugee crisis, exceeding 12 million displaced individuals, with hundreds of thousands facing starvation. These actions are exacerbating existing regional instability.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the brutality of the RSF, particularly highlighting their massacres and use of terror tactics. While this is factually accurate, the article could benefit from a more balanced presentation by also detailing instances of violence committed by the Sudanese army. The repeated emphasis on RSF atrocities, while justified, might unintentionally skew the reader's perception of the conflict's overall nature.
Language Bias
While the article strives for objectivity, certain word choices could be considered slightly loaded. For example, consistently referring to the RSF's actions as "terror" might be perceived as emotionally charged. More neutral terms, such as "violence" or "attacks," could be used in some instances. Additionally, phrases like 'the army is struggling to maintain its last position' could be more neutral, perhaps replaced with something like 'the army is defending its remaining stronghold'
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the conflict in Kordofan, but omits details about the involvement of international actors beyond mentioning the UAE's support for the RSF. The perspectives of other countries involved in the conflict, or international organizations actively working towards a resolution, are absent. This omission limits the reader's understanding of the broader geopolitical context of the conflict.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the conflict, portraying it primarily as a struggle between the Sudanese army and the RSF. While this is the central conflict, the article doesn't delve into the complexities of the various tribal and ethnic dynamics fueling the fighting or the role of other armed groups. This simplification risks presenting a false dichotomy.
Sustainable Development Goals
The ongoing conflict in Sudan has caused a major humanitarian crisis, with over 12 million displaced people and hundreds of thousands facing famine. This widespread displacement and food insecurity exacerbate poverty and hinder development progress.