theglobeandmail.com
Beautiful Evening, Beautiful Day": Persecution of Gay Artists in 1950s Yugoslavia
Beautiful Evening, Beautiful Day," a 131-minute Croatian-Canadian drama directed by Ivona Juka and released May 30th, depicts the persecution of four gay artists and filmmakers on Barren Island, a former Yugoslavian prison in the 1950s, using stark imagery to portray violence and bigotry under the communist regime of Josip Broz Tito.
- How does the film's setting on Barren Island, a former Yugoslavian prison, contribute to its narrative and thematic impact?
- The film uses its depiction of historical events, such as the separation of Jews and Serbs during WWII and the assault of a gay character, to highlight the pervasive nature of persecution and violence against marginalized groups in Yugoslavia. This underscores the film's broader message against bigotry and fascism. The use of Barren Island, a real-life prison, adds another layer to the story.
- What is the central theme of "Beautiful Evening, Beautiful Day", and how does it reflect broader historical and societal issues?
- Beautiful Evening, Beautiful Day", a Croatian drama directed by Ivona Juka, depicts the persecution of artists and filmmakers in 1950s Yugoslavia due to their sexual orientation. The film, set on Barren Island—a former Yugoslavian prison—features brutal scenes depicting the violence they faced under the communist regime. The movie premiered in select theaters on May 30th, running for 131 minutes.
- Despite its strong performances and historical context, why does the film fall short of its potential emotional impact, and what could have improved its power?
- While the film's passionate portrayal of suffering is commendable, its conventional filmmaking style and infrequent emotional beats prevent it from reaching its full potential. Although the performances are strong and the historical context is compelling, the emotional impact feels less potent than intended, creating a sense of mild frustration instead of deep heartbreak. The juxtaposition of black-and-white past and full-color future attempts to highlight the transition but may fall short of a truly powerful impact.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review focuses primarily on the film's emotional impact and pacing, framing it as a film that strives for greatness but falls short due to inconsistent pacing. The headline and introduction emphasize emotional responses ("raises your pulse," "catches your breath," "heartbreak") rather than providing a balanced view of the film's strengths and weaknesses. This might influence the reader's perception of the film's quality, focusing on the perceived emotional shortcomings instead of the potential artistic merit.
Language Bias
The review uses language that is largely neutral, but certain words like "brutal," "grim determination," and "mild frustration" subtly influence the reader's perception. These terms carry emotional weight that could affect the assessment of the film's quality. More neutral alternatives could include descriptions of the violence as "graphic" or "intense" and the director's approach as "determined." The phrase "merely digestible" is particularly subjective and could be replaced with a more objective assessment of the narrative.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the film's emotional impact and narrative structure, but omits discussion of specific cinematic techniques, acting performances beyond noting they are "strong", and the film's overall artistic merit outside of subjective emotional responses. It also doesn't delve into the historical accuracy of the depicted events, which would provide a more complete analysis. This omission could limit the reader's understanding of the film's success beyond an emotional response.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a somewhat false dichotomy between the film's "engrossing" and "merely digestible" aspects. The reviewer doesn't explore the possibility of both coexisting or offer a nuanced perspective on the uneven pacing. This simplistic framing may overshadow a more complex assessment of the film's overall narrative structure.
Sustainable Development Goals
The movie depicts historical events such as the separation of Jews from Serbs during WWII and the persecution of gay people in 1950s Yugoslavia under Tito's rule. By portraying these injustices, the film raises awareness of past human rights violations and promotes reflection on the importance of peace, justice, and strong institutions to prevent similar atrocities.