theguardian.com
Bedevil": A Surreal Australian Horror Film
Tracey Moffatt's 1993 horror film "Bedevil", the first feature film directed by an Australian Aboriginal woman, uses surreal sets and non-linear storytelling to explore Indigenous spirituality and challenge Western narrative conventions, receiving some international acclaim but remaining relatively underappreciated.
- What is the primary global significance of Tracey Moffatt's "Bedevil" and what are its immediate impacts?
- Tracey Moffatt's "Bedevil" uses surreal sets and hypnagogic locations to create a unique horror experience, blending timelines and challenging Western storytelling conventions. The film, a triptych of supernatural stories, features jarring juxtapositions, such as a tourism commercial segment interrupting a menacing scene. It's the first feature film directed by an Australian Aboriginal woman.
- How does "Bedevil" challenge conventional horror filmmaking and what are the broader implications of its narrative structure?
- Bedevil" received some international acclaim but remains underappreciated. Its unconventional style, blending abstract horror with faux-documentary elements and jarring tonal shifts, defies easy categorization. The film's exploration of Indigenous Australian spirituality and its subversion of linear narratives contribute to its unique power.
- What are the long-term implications of "Bedevil"'s under-appreciation and how might its unconventional approach influence future horror films?
- Moffatt's "Bedevil" anticipates future trends in horror filmmaking by rejecting traditional jump scares and gore in favor of psychological and atmospheric dread. Its exploration of Indigenous perspectives and its innovative approach to storytelling offer a powerful model for future filmmakers seeking to challenge conventional genre conventions and broaden representation in the industry. The film's continued neglect highlights the persistent challenges faced by Indigenous filmmakers in gaining recognition and distribution.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is overwhelmingly positive, celebrating Moffatt's artistic vision and the film's unique qualities. While acknowledging that the film 'wasn't going to be everybody's cup of tea,' this is presented as a minor point, not detracting from the overall enthusiastic appraisal. The focus is on the film's artistic merit and its place within Australian cinema history, potentially overshadowing any potential criticisms.
Language Bias
The language used is largely positive and evocative, using words like "intoxicating," "hypnagogic," and "compelling." While subjective, this language doesn't present a significant bias. The use of phrases like 'audacious touch – so crazy it works' shows a positive reception to the film's unconventional style.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the director's artistic choices and the film's unique style, potentially omitting discussion of the film's plot or narrative structure in detail. While acknowledging the film's unconventional nature, a more in-depth analysis of the storyline and its impact on the audience could provide a fuller picture. There is no mention of the film's reception by general audiences, focusing instead on critical acclaim and festival appearances. This omission might skew the overall assessment of the film's success and impact.
Sustainable Development Goals
The film's success at the Cannes Film Festival and its critical acclaim contribute to the promotion of Australian cinema and art, enriching cultural understanding and promoting diversity in artistic expression. The film challenges linear storytelling, enriching viewers' understanding of narrative structure and potentially fostering critical thinking skills.