dw.com
Belarus Eliminates Pension Restrictions for Working Retirees
Belarus lifted restrictions on pension amounts for working pensioners on January 1, 2025, leading to approximately 10,000 retirees returning to the workforce; previously, 110,000 faced deductions up to 500 rubles (140 euros).
- What is the immediate impact of removing pension restrictions for working pensioners in Belarus?
- In Belarus, about 2.4 million people (26% of the population) receive pensions, with 460,000 of them still working. Following the January 1, 2025 removal of restrictions on pension amounts for working pensioners, approximately 10,000 individuals returned to the workforce.
- How does the Belarusian pension system's structure influence the decision of pensioners to continue working?
- The elimination of restrictions on pensions for working pensioners in Belarus aims to increase workforce participation among retirees. Previously, about 110,000 pensioners faced deductions up to 500 rubles (140 euros), impacting their income. This change follows a trend of many pensioners continuing to work due to low pension amounts and desire for additional income.
- What are the long-term implications of this policy change and what alternative solutions exist to address the underlying issues of the Belarusian pension system?
- The recent policy change in Belarus may lead to a notable increase in the number of working pensioners. However, long-term sustainability requires addressing the underlying issue of low pensions, potentially through pension system reform and introducing mandatory accumulation elements. The current system may not be financially prepared for this change, given the already strained demographic situation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the removal of pension restrictions positively, highlighting the increased labor participation of pensioners and the potential economic benefits. The negative aspects, such as potential financial strain on the system or the impact on younger workers, are largely absent. The inclusion of personal anecdotes of working pensioners supports this positive framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, however, phrases like "лучшей" (best) when describing a pensioner's performance and descriptions of pensioners as "young pensioners" may subtly shape the reader's perception. The article might benefit from more precise and neutral terms to avoid potential bias.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the positive impacts of removing pension restrictions for working pensioners, but omits discussion of potential negative consequences such as increased strain on the labor market for younger workers or the financial sustainability of the pension system in the long term. It also doesn't explore alternative solutions to support elderly citizens besides raising the retirement age or increasing the pension amount.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that raising the retirement age is the only or best solution to address the challenges of the pension system. It overlooks other potential solutions, such as reforming the pension system or implementing a mandatory savings component.
Gender Bias
While the article includes perspectives from both male and female pensioners, it does disproportionately focus on the experiences of women, potentially reinforcing gender stereotypes about women's roles in the workforce and their financial reliance on pensions. The discussion of raising the retirement age focuses more on the implications for women.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a policy change in Belarus that eliminates limitations on pension payments for working pensioners. This is expected to increase the labor force participation of older adults, boosting economic activity and potentially improving the overall productivity and economic growth. The removal of financial disincentives to work encourages older individuals to remain active in the workforce, contributing their skills and experience to the economy. Several quotes from working pensioners show the positive impacts of continued employment on their financial well-being and quality of life. This directly contributes to SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth, specifically target 8.3, which promotes decent work for all, including older persons.