dw.com
Belarussian Oil Refineries Face Challenges Amidst Shrinking Profits and Shifting Markets
Belarussian oil refineries in Mozyr and Novopolotsk are struggling with reduced profitability due to narrowing price spreads, decreased Russian compensation, and expensive logistics, leading to potential production cuts of 5-10% compared to 2023.
- What is the current state of Belarusian oil refineries, and what factors contribute to their declining profitability?
- Belarussian oil refineries are facing significant challenges. The spread between Urals and Brent crude oil prices has narrowed, reducing the profitability of selling refined products. Additionally, Russian compensation for tax maneuvers, around $1 billion in 2024, is decreasing, and expensive logistics through Russian ports further reduce profit margins.
- How have changes in export markets and logistics impacted Belarusian oil refineries' operations and financial performance?
- Previously relying on Ukraine and the EU, Belarusian oil refineries now export mainly through Russian ports, significantly increasing logistics costs. This, coupled with reduced Russian compensation and narrowing price spreads, resulted in the Naftan refinery's profitability turning negative in the first half of 2024, while Mozyr refinery experienced a worsening loss, reaching -3.9%.
- What are the potential future implications for Belarusian oil refineries, considering the current economic situation and geopolitical factors?
- The Belarusian oil refining industry faces uncertainty. Reduced profitability may cause production cuts, estimated at 5-10%. While selling to Russia could alleviate some issues due to a potential shortage of refined products following Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian refineries, the overall outlook is negative unless significant changes occur in global markets or logistics. The final buyers of Belarusian oil products remain largely unknown, suggesting complex trade schemes are involved.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view by including both positive and negative aspects of the Belarusian oil refining industry's situation. The economist's perspective is presented without overt editorial framing, although the selection of the economist as a source might subtly influence the narrative towards a more critical viewpoint.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. The economist uses precise terminology ('spread', 'tax maneuver compensation') and avoids overtly emotional or loaded language. However, phrases such as "balancing on the brink of survival" could be considered slightly dramatic.
Bias by Omission
The article acknowledges the lack of publicly available data on Belarusian oil refining statistics, which is a significant limitation. This lack of transparency is highlighted as a key obstacle to a complete analysis. The article does, however, attempt to draw conclusions from indirect indicators, such as regional industrial production figures.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the decline in Belarusian oil refining, impacting the availability and affordability of energy. Reduced refining capacity and export challenges directly affect energy supply chains and potentially lead to higher energy prices for Belarus and its trading partners. The economic challenges faced by Belarusian refineries due to factors like narrowing price spreads and increased logistics costs threaten energy security and affordability.