taz.de
Berlin Jusos Abandon "Islamism" Term Amidst Growing Relativism on the Left
The Berlin Jusos voted to stop using the term "Islamism", citing concerns about stigmatization, contrasting with previous criticisms of the Left's silence on the issue; this reflects a broader trend of relativism or downplaying of Islamism's dangers within parts of the Left, as seen in some participation in antisemitic and Islamist protests following the October 7, 2023, massacre in Israel.
- How might the avoidance of the term "Islamism" impact the fight against Islamist extremism, and what alternative approaches could be more effective?
- The long-term consequence of avoiding the term "Islamism" is a failure to effectively address the threat posed by Islamist extremism. This approach not only risks emboldening Islamist groups but also undermines efforts to protect secular and liberal Muslims who are often targeted by radical elements within their own communities. The focus should be on confronting the ideology itself, not avoiding a label.
- What are the immediate implications of the Berlin Jusos' decision to avoid using the term "Islamism," and how does this relate to broader trends within the Left?
- The Berlin Jusos, a youth organization within Germany's Social Democratic Party, recently voted to stop using the term "Islamism," citing concerns about its proximity to Islam and potential for stigmatization. This decision contrasts sharply with statements made by former Juso leader Kevin Kühnert in 2020, who criticized the Left's silence on Islamism following the murder of Samuel Paty in France.
- What are the underlying causes behind the shift in some Left-leaning circles towards relativism or downplaying of Islamism, and what are the potential consequences?
- The Jusos' decision reflects a broader trend within parts of the Left, where silence about Islamism has given way to active relativism or downplaying of its dangers. This is evidenced by the participation of some Left-leaning individuals in antisemitic and Islamist protests following the October 7, 2023, massacre in Israel, including instances of individuals dressing as Hamas terrorists or carrying the group's flag.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the Jusos' decision to avoid the term "Islamism" as a sign of increasing confusion and a capitulation to Islamist views. The headline and opening paragraph immediately establish a negative tone, setting the stage for a critical analysis of the left's response. This framing might lead the reader to prejudge the Jusos' motivations and the broader debate.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, emotionally charged language such as "increasing confusion," "relativize or actively downplay," "genocidal massacre," and "murderous gang." These terms contribute to a negative and accusatory tone, potentially influencing reader perception. More neutral alternatives could include "growing uncertainty," "downplay," "massacre," and "extremist group." The repeated use of "Linke" (left) could also be seen as loaded, suggesting a monolithic and negative view of the left.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the left's response to Islamism, particularly within the Jusos, but omits discussion of other political groups' stances or broader societal concerns about Islamism. This omission could leave the reader with a skewed perception of the issue, neglecting potential alternative viewpoints and the complexity of the problem.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the debate as solely between those who use the term "Islamism" and those who avoid it. It ignores the possibility of nuanced discussions and alternative terminologies that could address concerns about the term while still engaging with the underlying issues.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the concerning trend of left-wing groups downplaying or ignoring Islamism, hindering efforts to combat extremism and promote peace and justice. Relativizing or actively minimizing Islamism, as evidenced by participation in antisemitic and Islamist protests, undermines efforts to establish strong institutions and ensure peace. The refusal to use the term "Islamism" itself creates an obstacle to open discussion and effective counter-terrorism strategies. This inaction directly contributes to a climate of impunity for extremist groups.