usa.chinadaily.com.cn
Biden Administration Bolsters Alliances to Counter China
The Biden administration is bolstering its alliances in the Indo-Pacific and Atlantic regions to counter China's influence before its term ends, involving high-level visits to key countries in Asia and Europe, despite criticisms of hypocrisy and inconsistent application of values.
- What are the immediate implications of the Biden administration's efforts to simultaneously strengthen its Indo-Pacific and transatlantic alliances, and what specific actions are being taken to achieve this?
- The Biden administration, nearing the end of its term, is actively working to solidify its Indo-Pacific partnerships while maintaining its transatlantic alliances. This effort aims to prevent a power vacuum that could be exploited by adversaries, particularly China, as stated by Secretary of State Antony Blinken. Recent high-level visits to key countries in Asia and Europe underscore this strategy.
- How effective has the Biden administration's strategy of portraying China as a threat been in influencing the actions of its European allies, and what are the potential long-term consequences of this approach?
- The administration's actions reflect a broader strategy of containing China's influence by building alliances based on shared values and interests. This approach, however, has been criticized for hypocrisy, selective application of values, and a lack of transparency, particularly concerning the US's economic interests in the Ukraine conflict and its inconsistent stance on human rights issues.
- What are the potential long-term impacts of the US's current approach to China on global stability and the economic interests of both countries, and what alternative approaches could be considered by the next administration?
- The success of this strategy hinges on the next administration's approach to China. Continued antagonism towards China risks further global instability and could backfire, harming the US's own interests. Conversely, a shift towards cooperation and mutual respect could lead to a more stable and beneficial relationship for both nations.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames China as a primary threat, consistently highlighting negative actions and intentions. The headline and introduction emphasize the Biden administration's efforts to counter China, shaping the reader's perception of China as primarily antagonistic.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "bad actor", "scaremongering", "brazenness", and "chaos and conflict" to describe the actions of the US and China. These terms carry strong negative connotations and lack neutrality. More neutral alternatives could include phrases such as "challenger", "efforts to influence", "assertiveness", and "tensions".
Bias by Omission
The analysis omits discussion of potential benefits or positive aspects of China's economic development and its global engagement. It focuses heavily on negative portrayals and potential threats, neglecting a balanced perspective on China's role in the world.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between cooperation with the US and cooperation with China, suggesting that nations must choose a side. This ignores the possibility of multilateralism and independent foreign policies.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the Biden administration's foreign policy focused on containing China, creating geopolitical tensions and potentially undermining international cooperation. Actions such as imposing sanctions and spreading fear contribute to instability and hinder the peaceful resolution of conflicts. The pursuit of strategic advantage at the expense of multilateralism negatively impacts global peace and security.