lemonde.fr
Big Tech's Strategic Investment in Impact Evaluation
Big Tech companies like Amazon are massively investing in impact evaluation, a research field merging statistics and econometrics, to optimize user engagement and product design, employing hundreds of economists to analyze data and improve their services.
- What is the primary impact of Big Tech's investment in impact evaluation on their business models and user experiences?
- The Big Tech companies (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft) are heavily investing in impact evaluation, a research discipline combining statistics and econometrics, to optimize their products and maximize user engagement. This involves comparing different versions of products or interfaces to determine which generates the most clicks or time spent.
- How does the application of impact evaluation in the tech industry compare to its use in other fields, such as healthcare and public policy?
- This investment reflects a shift in how these companies operate; they are increasingly leveraging rigorous scientific methods to improve efficiency and user experience. Amazon, for instance, employs 400 economists—a workforce larger than the US Federal Reserve's economics department and eight times that of Harvard's.
- What potential ethical concerns and societal implications arise from Big Tech's use of impact evaluation to manipulate user behavior and optimize engagement?
- The growing use of impact evaluation by Big Tech companies indicates a future where product development and marketing strategies are driven by data-backed evidence. This will likely influence competition, as companies strive for increasingly precise optimization, leading to potentially more targeted advertising and user experiences.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames GAFAM's investment in impact assessment as a natural extension of their investments in AI and quantum computing, emphasizing the economic benefits and the recruitment of top researchers. This framing might downplay potential societal or ethical implications.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective. The description of impact assessment is factual, and the use of statistics to illustrate Amazon's recruitment of economists strengthens the article's credibility.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the GAFAM companies' investment in impact assessment, and its application within their business models. However, it omits discussion of potential ethical concerns related to the use of impact assessment for maximizing user engagement and advertising revenue. The lack of counterarguments or critical perspectives on the potential downsides of this technology constitutes a significant omission.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights that GAFAM companies are heavily investing in impact assessment to optimize their products and maximize user engagement. While this might lead to economic growth, it also raises concerns about potential biases and inequalities in algorithms, potentially exacerbating existing disparities in access to information and resources. The focus on maximizing clicks and user time spent on platforms could lead to manipulative practices that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations or those with limited digital literacy.