lemonde.fr
Biodiversity: From Concept to Global Concern
The term "biological diversity" gained prominence in the 1980s, formalized by the 2012 creation of IPBES and the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, reflecting growing international concern following the IUCN's 1964 Red List of threatened ecosystems, which highlighted the impact of human activities on nature.
- What specific actions or events significantly advanced the global recognition and understanding of biodiversity in the 20th and 21st centuries?
- The term "biological diversity" emerged in the early 20th century but gained prominence in the 1980s with conservation biology. Michael Soulé's 1986 book, "Conservation Biology", significantly contributed to this. The 2012 creation of IPBES formalized the concept's use across biological, taxonomic, functional, and genetic levels.
- What are the key challenges in accurately measuring and addressing biodiversity loss, and what future trends or strategies should be prioritized to effectively conserve biodiversity?
- Despite the progress in recognizing and measuring biodiversity loss—using field science, population science, and modeling—challenges remain. The ongoing decline in genetic variety and the disappearance of fragile ecosystems highlight the need for continued research and effective conservation strategies. Future efforts should focus on addressing the root causes of biodiversity loss and implementing solutions at a global scale.
- How did the IUCN's early work on ecosystem monitoring and the subsequent creation of the IPBES contribute to the current understanding and conservation efforts related to biodiversity?
- The increasing institutionalization of biodiversity, marked by IPBES's creation and the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, reflects a growing global awareness of nature's value. This awareness is rooted in earlier efforts, such as the IUCN's 1964 Red List of threatened ecosystems, showcasing a long-term trend of environmental concern.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative primarily frames biodiversity loss as a scientific and institutional issue, emphasizing the development of concepts and organizations. While the impact of human activities is mentioned, the framing may underplay the role of social and political factors in biodiversity loss. The focus on the timeline of scientific discoveries and institutional initiatives may unintentionally minimize the urgency of the current crisis.
Bias by Omission
The text focuses on the historical development of the concept of biodiversity and its institutionalization, but omits discussion of potential controversies or differing viewpoints regarding biodiversity conservation. It doesn't mention debates around specific conservation strategies or the economic and social impacts of biodiversity loss. The absence of these perspectives could limit the reader's understanding of the complexities surrounding this issue.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the decline in biodiversity, including the loss of genetic variety and the disappearance of fragile ecosystems. This directly relates to the SDG 15, Life on Land, which aims to protect, restore, and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss. The creation of IPBES and the IUCN Red List are mentioned as efforts to address this issue, but the overall tone indicates an ongoing negative impact.