repubblica.it
Biotech Expert Dispels Putin-Xi Immortality Claims, Highlights Longevity Research
Bloomberg reported a conversation between Putin and Xi about immortality, sparking global discussion; however, a biotechnologist clarifies that while longevity research is advancing rapidly, claims of readily available immortality or 150-year lifespans are currently unrealistic.
- What specific areas of longevity research are showing the most promise, and what are the leading companies and technologies involved?
- Significant advancements include CRISPR gene editing, senolytic drugs targeting aged cells, epigenetic reprogramming, and regenerative medicine creating bioengineered tissues and organoids. Leading companies like Altos Labs (epigenetic reprogramming), Calico (Alphabet/Google), and numerous startups are investing billions in areas such as anti-aging drugs and bioengineered organs.
- What are the realistic expectations for human lifespan extension in the near future, and what broader societal implications should be considered?
- The realistic goal is extending healthspan—the period of healthy life—by preventing age-related diseases. This requires combining scientific advancements with lifestyle changes and public policies. While immortality remains science fiction, significant progress in slowing aging and improving healthspan is achievable. The aging global population and increasing age-related diseases demand immediate socio-economic solutions.
- What is the current state of biotechnological advancements related to human lifespan extension, and how realistic are the claims made by Putin and Xi regarding immortality?
- While biotechnology is rapidly advancing, with breakthroughs in bioengineered organs, stem cells, and regenerative medicine, the claims of readily achieving immortality or incessantly transplanting organs are inaccurate. Repeated vital organ transplants are currently unsustainable, even with future biocompatible organs, due to the body's complex systems. A 150-year lifespan is currently not feasible.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view by presenting the claims of Putin and Xi Jinping alongside a counterargument from a biotecnologist. The headline does not sensationalize the claims, and the article's structure allows for a nuanced discussion of the topic. However, the selection of a biotecnologist as the primary counter-argument might subtly frame the debate within the context of current scientific possibilities, potentially downplaying other relevant perspectives, such as philosophical or ethical viewpoints.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective, using terms like "fantascienza" (science fiction) to clearly label unsubstantiated claims. The use of direct quotes from the purported conversation and the expert adds to objectivity. However, descriptors such as "surreale" (surreal) applied to the conversation might subtly suggest a negative judgment.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the scientific feasibility of the claims made by Putin and Xi Jinping. While this is a significant aspect, it omits potential political or social implications of such claims and the context surrounding their utterance during a military parade. Discussion of the potential implications of longevity research on resource allocation, healthcare systems, and social structures could strengthen the analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article directly addresses SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) by discussing advancements in biotechnologies aimed at extending healthy lifespan and treating age-related diseases. The focus on senolytic drugs, gene editing, and regenerative medicine directly relates to improving health and well-being, and reducing the burden of chronic diseases associated with aging. The research discussed has the potential to significantly improve the healthspan of individuals, contributing positively to SDG 3 targets related to reducing premature mortality and promoting healthy aging.