smh.com.au
Boom Supersonic's XB-1 to Attempt to Break Sound Barrier
Boom Supersonic's XB-1, a prototype supersonic passenger jet, will attempt to break the sound barrier above the Mojave Desert on Tuesday, aiming for a speed of Mach 1.1 in a test flight that will be livestreamed; this follows 11 previous test flights and is intended to pave the way for passenger service by the early 2020s.
- How might the aviation industry's commitment to net-zero carbon emissions impact Boom Supersonic's long-term viability?
- The project faces significant hurdles, requiring billions more in funding and a yet-to-be-developed engine. The industry's commitment to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 poses a considerable challenge, though Boom plans to use sustainable aviation fuel. The collapse of competitor Aerion in 2021 highlights the financial risks involved.
- What are the immediate implications if Boom Supersonic successfully breaks the sound barrier with its XB-1 demonstrator?
- Boom Supersonic's XB-1 demonstrator will attempt to break the sound barrier on Tuesday, aiming to exceed Mach 1 (1235 km/h) in four-minute runs above the Mojave Desert. This successful test flight could pave the way for supersonic passenger services by the early 2020s.
- What are the main challenges Boom Supersonic faces in transitioning from prototype testing to commercial supersonic passenger flights?
- The test, livestreamed on Boom's website, takes place in the same airspace where Chuck Yeager first broke the sound barrier. Boom aims to produce 33 Overture jets annually, carrying around 65 passengers each, with plans to double production. Airlines like United and American have placed preliminary orders.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the project very positively, emphasizing the technological achievements and the potential for future passenger service. The headline and opening sentences immediately highlight the speed and ambition of the endeavor. While challenges are mentioned, they are presented as hurdles to be overcome rather than fundamental risks. The comparison to Concorde and the mention of significant airline orders contribute to a sense of inevitability and success.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, with terms like "demonstrator," "test plane," and "cruising speed." However, phrases like "pave the way" and "formidable barrier" inject subtle optimism and challenges. Replacing these with more neutral terms such as "facilitate" or "significant obstacle" would improve objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the technical aspects and commercial viability of Boom Supersonic's project, but omits discussion of potential environmental impacts beyond the mention of sustainable aviation fuel. The social and economic implications of supersonic travel, such as noise pollution near flight paths or the accessibility of such a service to a wide range of passengers, are also not addressed. This omission could mislead readers into believing that the only concerns are technical and financial.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the challenges facing Boom Supersonic. While it acknowledges the financial hurdles and the need for sustainable fuel, it doesn't fully explore the complex interplay of economic, environmental, and regulatory factors that could determine the project's success or failure. The portrayal of sustainable aviation fuel as a simple solution to carbon emission concerns overlooks the considerable challenges involved in scaling its production and widespread adoption.
Sustainable Development Goals
The development and potential deployment of supersonic passenger jets could significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions from air travel, counteracting efforts towards climate change mitigation. The article highlights the industry's commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050, but the viability of achieving this with supersonic flight using sustainable aviation fuel remains uncertain and a significant challenge.