theglobeandmail.com
Boosting Advisory Practice Valuation: Three Key Strategies
Three key strategies—organic growth, next-generation talent development, and geographical expansion—can significantly increase an advisory practice's valuation, potentially raising its value by 50 percent, according to a 2024 survey.
- What are the most effective strategies for increasing the valuation of an advisory practice?
- Advisory practices can significantly increase their value by focusing on organic growth, developing a strong team, and expanding their geographical reach. A 2024 survey showed average AUM growth of 18.2 percent, but organic growth was only 6.7 percent, highlighting the importance of strategic growth initiatives.
- How does building a strong next-generation team and expanding geographically impact a practice's valuation?
- Consistent organic growth of 10 percent or more annually can boost valuation by 15-20 percent. Similarly, a robust next-generation team ready for succession adds 15-20 percent to valuation, while geographical diversification adds 5-10 percent. These factors significantly impact a practice's overall value.
- What are the potential long-term financial consequences of neglecting organic growth, team development, and geographical diversification in an advisory practice?
- Failing to implement these strategies could leave considerable value unrealized. For example, a practice valued at two times trailing revenue could see that increase to three times—a 50 percent gain—by focusing on these key areas. This translates to substantial long-term financial benefits for the practice owner.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the strategies as essential for increasing valuation and securing a premium price. The positive tone and emphasis on potential gains may overstate the impact of these strategies and downplay potential risks or challenges. The use of phrases like "significantly enhance" and "secure a premium price" influences the reader's perception.
Language Bias
The language used is generally positive and promotional, emphasizing the benefits of the strategies. Terms like "most critical driver," "significantly enhance," and "premium price" are used to encourage adoption. More neutral alternatives could include phrases like "important factor," "increase," and "higher price.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on strategies to increase advisory practice valuation and doesn't discuss potential drawbacks or alternative approaches. It omits discussion of potential challenges in attracting and retaining next-generation talent, or the costs associated with geographical expansion. This omission might limit the reader's ability to fully assess the feasibility and risks involved in implementing these strategies.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of practice valuation, suggesting that these three strategies are the primary drivers of value. It doesn't acknowledge other factors that might influence value, such as the quality of client relationships, the sophistication of investment strategies, or the regulatory environment.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article emphasizes strategies for increasing the value of advisory practices, directly contributing to economic growth and creating better job opportunities within the financial sector. Improving organic growth, developing next-generation talent, and expanding geographically all lead to increased revenue and enhanced business sustainability, thus promoting decent work and economic growth.